1997PubMedRequires access

Laboratory techniques for diagnosis of chlamydial infections of the eye.

U K Baveja, M K Hiranandani, P Talwar, D K Sen

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Giemsa and fluorescence antibody (FA) staining were used to diagnose patients clinically suspected to be suffering from trachoma. A total of 52 controls i.e. individuals with refractive errors and no clinical trachoma and 173 cases suffering from different stages of trachoma were studied. FA was found to be 2.52 times more sensitive in confirming the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis compared to Giemsa staining. 28/52 (53.8%) and 4/52 (7.,69%) controls were also positive by FA and Giemsa staining, respectively, indicating sub-clinical infection without symptoms. Post treatment staining with both methods revealed that clinical cure of trachoma did not necessarily mean the absence of Chlamydia trachomatis in the conjunctival smears. As a corollary it can be deduced that mere presence of Chlamydia trachomatis in conjunctival epithelial cells may not cause clinical trachoma, certain host factors (local immunity etc.) may play an important role in clinical disease.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Giemsa and fluorescence antibody (FA) staining were used to diagnose patients clinically suspected to be suffering from trachoma. A total of 52 controls i.e. individuals with refractive errors and no clinical trachoma and 173 cases suffering from different stages of trachoma were studied. FA was found to be 2.52 times more sensitive in confirming the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis compared to Giemsa staining. 28/52 (53.8%) and 4/52 (7.,69%) controls were also positive by FA and Giemsa staining, respectively, indicating sub-clinical infection without symptoms. Post treatment staining with both methods revealed that clinical cure of trachoma did not necessarily mean the absence of Chlamydia trachomatis in the conjunctival smears. As a corollary it can be deduced that mere presence of Chlamydia trachomatis in conjunctival epithelial cells may not cause clinical trachoma, certain host factors (local immunity etc.) may play an important role in clinical disease.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Giemsa and fluorescence antibody (FA) staining were used to diagnose patients clinically suspected to be suffering from trachoma. A total of 52 controls i.e. individuals with refractive errors and no clinical trachoma and 173 cases suffering from different stages of trachoma were studied. FA was found to be 2.52 times more sensitive in confirming the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis compared to Giemsa staining. 28/52 (53.8%) and 4/52 (7.,69%) controls were also positive by FA and Giemsa staining, respectively, indicating sub-clinical infection without symptoms. Post treatment staining with both methods revealed that clinical cure of trachoma did not necessarily mean the absence of Chlamydia trachomatis in the conjunctival smears. As a corollary it can be deduced that mere presence of Chlamydia trachomatis in conjunctival epithelial cells may not cause clinical trachoma, certain host factors (local immunity etc.) may play an important role in clinical disease.

Key concepts: Trachoma, Giemsa stain, Chlamydia trachomatis, Staining, Chlamydia, Medicine, Chlamydiaceae, Immunology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Laboratory techniques for diagnosis of chlamydial infections of the eye. — Research Paper | ScholarLens