Removal of Harrington's distraction apparatus after vertebral arthrodesis.
F. Travaglini
Abstract
F. Travaglini
Abstract
The author reviews 13 cases of vertebral arthrodesis for scoliosis, during the five years from 1977 to 1981, in which the Harrington distraction apparatus was removed. Contrary to opinions expressed in the literature, there were no technical difficulties or allied complications. Only in 4 cases was the arthrodesis area fully inspected, and then only to check the condition of the graft. In 9 cases the distraction apparatus was removed by a limited exposure of the extremities of the initial operation area.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The author reviews 13 cases of vertebral arthrodesis for scoliosis, during the five years from 1977 to 1981, in which the Harrington distraction apparatus was removed. Contrary to opinions expressed in the literature, there were no technical difficulties or allied complications. Only in 4 cases was the arthrodesis area fully inspected, and then only to check the condition of the graft. In 9 cases the distraction apparatus was removed by a limited exposure of the extremities of the initial operation area.
Key concepts: Medicine, Distraction, Arthrodesis, Scoliosis, Surgery, Orthodontics, Alternative medicine, Biology