2015•Unpublished venueRequires access

PTH-048 Quality of life and ileo-anal pouch function after restorative proctocolectomy: a 20-year experience

Nirmal Randhawa, A Barlow

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction Ileo-anal pouch formation is the preferred option for restoring continuity in patients post proctocolectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term functional outcome of the W-pouch and its impact on the patient’s quality of life. Method A consecutive series of 62 patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy with W ileo-anal pouch formation between 1995 and 2014 were sent questionnaires to assess the long-term functional outcome of the pouch and its effect on their quality of life (QOL). Patients had been operated on by a single surgeon using an identical technique. Patients were divided in to two groups: patients who have been living with a pouch for 10 years or more or those who have had a pouch for less than 10 years. The differences between both groups were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results 38 out of 62 patients (61%) responded to the postal questionnaires. They were similar to the overall group in terms of gender, age, length of stay and indication for surgery. Overall, 27 patients (71%) reported <5 bowel movements (BM)/day and nine (24%) reported no BM at night. 37 patients (97%) reported good or excellent continence. Only one patient had soiling either during day or night. 30 patients (79%) were able to defer defecation for >1 h. Anti-diarrhoea medication was needed daily by 15 patients (39%) or occasionally by seven patients (18%). A possible episode of pouchitis was reported by 13 patients (34%). 35 patients (92%) preferred a pouch to an ileostomy. There was no difference in functional outcomes reported by those who had a pouch <10 years (20 patients) compared with those with a pouch >10 years (18 patients). QOL measures were also similar across both groups. However, anxiety levels were found to be higher in those with a pouch >10 years (p = 0.02). Conclusion Patients with ileo-anal pouch anastomosis have a good quality of life and long-term pouch outcome, which does not deteriorate with time. Disclosure of interest None Declared. References Perrin, A. Quality of life after ileo-anal pouch formation: patient perceptions. Br J Nurs. 2012;26(21):16 Andersson T, Lunde OC, Johnson E et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with ileo-anal anastomosis for colitis.Colorectal Dis. 2011;4:431–7

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction Ileo-anal pouch formation is the preferred option for restoring continuity in patients post proctocolectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term functional outcome of the W-pouch and its impact on the patient’s quality of life. Method A consecutive series of 62 patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy with W ileo-anal pouch formation between 1995 and 2014 were sent questionnaires to assess the long-term functional outcome of the pouch and its effect on their quality of life (QOL). Patients had been operated on by a single surgeon using an identical technique. Patients were divided in to two groups: patients who have been living with a pouch for 10 years or more or those who have had a pouch for less than 10 years. The differences between both groups were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results 38 out of 62 patients (61%) responded to the postal questionnaires. They were similar to the overall group in terms of gender, age, length of stay and indication for surgery. Overall, 27 patients (71%) reported <5 bowel movements (BM)/day and nine (24%) reported no BM at night. 37 patients (97%) reported good or excellent continence. Only one patient had soiling either during day or night. 30 patients (79%) were able to defer defecation for >1 h. Anti-diarrhoea medication was needed daily by 15 patients (39%) or occasionally by seven patients (18%). A possible episode of pouchitis was reported by 13 patients (34%). 35 patients (92%) preferred a pouch to an ileostomy. There was no difference in functional outcomes reported by those who had a pouch <10 years (20 patients) compared with those with a pouch >10 years (18 patients). QOL measures were also similar across both groups. However, anxiety levels were found to be higher in those with a pouch >10 years (p = 0.02). Conclusion Patients with ileo-anal pouch anastomosis have a good quality of life and long-term pouch outcome, which does not deteriorate with time. Disclosure of interest None Declared. References Perrin, A. Quality of life after ileo-anal pouch formation: patient perceptions. Br J Nurs. 2012;26(21):16 Andersson T, Lunde OC, Johnson E et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with ileo-anal anastomosis for colitis.Colorectal Dis. 2011;4:431–7

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction Ileo-anal pouch formation is the preferred option for restoring continuity in patients post proctocolectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term functional outcome of the W-pouch and its impact on the patient’s quality of life. Method A consecutive series of 62 patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy with W ileo-anal pouch formation between 1995 and 2014 were sent questionnaires to assess the long-term functional outcome of the pouch and its effect on their quality of life (QOL). Patients had been operated on by a single surgeon using an identical technique. Patients were divided in to two groups: patients who have been living with a pouch for 10 years or more or those who have had a pouch for less than 10 years. The differences between both groups were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results 38 out of 62 patients (61%) responded to the postal questionnaires. They were similar to the overall group in terms of gender, age, length of stay and indication for surgery. Overall, 27 patients (71%) reported <5 bowel movements (BM)/day and nine (24%) reported no BM at night. 37 patients (97%) reported good or excellent continence. Only one patient had soiling either during day or night. 30 patients (79%) were able to defer defecation for >1 h. Anti-diarrhoea medication was needed daily by 15 patients (39%) or occasionally by seven patients (18%). A possible episode of pouchitis was reported by 13 patients (34%). 35 patients (92%) preferred a pouch to an ileostomy. There was no difference in functional outcomes reported by those who had a pouch <10 years (20 patients) compared with those with a pouch >10 years (18 patients). QOL measures were also similar across both groups. However, anxiety levels were found to be higher in those with a pouch >10 years (p = 0.02). Conclusion Patients with ileo-anal pouch anastomosis have a good quality of life and long-term pouch outcome, which does not deteriorate with time. Disclosure of interest None Declared. References Perrin, A. Quality of life after ileo-anal pouch formation: patient perceptions. Br J Nurs. 2012;26(21):16 Andersson T, Lunde OC, Johnson E et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with ileo-anal anastomosis for colitis.Colorectal Dis. 2011;4:431–7

Key concepts: Pouch, Proctocolectomy, Pouchitis, Medicine, Defecation, Quality of life (healthcare), Surgery, Ulcerative colitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PTH-048 Quality of life and ileo-anal pouch function after restorative proctocolectomy: a 20-year experience — Research Paper | ScholarLens