1975•PubMedRequires access

Photocarcinogenesis: lack of enhancement by fluorescent white agents.

Forbes Pd, F. Urbach

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

These studies were designed to determine whether fluorescent whitening agents (FWAs) could: (I) produce an augmented acute response of skin to a single ultraviolet light exposure (i.e., phototoxicity), or (II) increase the number or hasten the appearance of skin tumors after several ultraviolet light exposures (i.e., chemically enhanced photocarcinogenesis). Five substituted stilbene FWAs were screened for phototoxicity. The results of pretreatment with these agents were compared with pretreatment by a known photoxic agent, 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) or the vehicle (methanol) using the skin of hairless mice, miniature pigs, and man. None of the FWAs was phototoxic. Photocarcinogenesis testing involved pretreating hairless mouse skin with FWAs, 8-MOP, or methanol only before each daily exposure to simulated solar ultraviolet light. In terms of tumor yield and tumor development time, photocarcinogenesis was enhanced by 8-MOP, but not by FWAs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

These studies were designed to determine whether fluorescent whitening agents (FWAs) could: (I) produce an augmented acute response of skin to a single ultraviolet light exposure (i.e., phototoxicity), or (II) increase the number or hasten the appearance of skin tumors after several ultraviolet light exposures (i.e., chemically enhanced photocarcinogenesis). Five substituted stilbene FWAs were screened for phototoxicity. The results of pretreatment with these agents were compared with pretreatment by a known photoxic agent, 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) or the vehicle (methanol) using the skin of hairless mice, miniature pigs, and man. None of the FWAs was phototoxic. Photocarcinogenesis testing involved pretreating hairless mouse skin with FWAs, 8-MOP, or methanol only before each daily exposure to simulated solar ultraviolet light. In terms of tumor yield and tumor development time, photocarcinogenesis was enhanced by 8-MOP, but not by FWAs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

These studies were designed to determine whether fluorescent whitening agents (FWAs) could: (I) produce an augmented acute response of skin to a single ultraviolet light exposure (i.e., phototoxicity), or (II) increase the number or hasten the appearance of skin tumors after several ultraviolet light exposures (i.e., chemically enhanced photocarcinogenesis). Five substituted stilbene FWAs were screened for phototoxicity. The results of pretreatment with these agents were compared with pretreatment by a known photoxic agent, 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) or the vehicle (methanol) using the skin of hairless mice, miniature pigs, and man. None of the FWAs was phototoxic. Photocarcinogenesis testing involved pretreating hairless mouse skin with FWAs, 8-MOP, or methanol only before each daily exposure to simulated solar ultraviolet light. In terms of tumor yield and tumor development time, photocarcinogenesis was enhanced by 8-MOP, but not by FWAs.

Key concepts: Phototoxicity, Hairless, Chemistry, Ultraviolet light, Ultraviolet, Fluorescence, Pharmacology, Dermatology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Photocarcinogenesis: lack of enhancement by fluorescent white agents. — Research Paper | ScholarLens