[Propofol and sevoflurane--a comparison of anesthesia for laryngomicrosurgery].
Mina Nishimori, Mitsuhiro Takasaki, T Akune, K Hanaoka
Abstract
Mina Nishimori, Mitsuhiro Takasaki, T Akune, K Hanaoka
Abstract
Laryngomicrosurgery has some special characteristics. It is under much stress such as intubation and direct laryngoscopy during a short operation time. Therefore both adequate anesthesia and quick recovery are needed. Thirty three ASA physical status I patients for laryngomicrosurgery were randomly assigned to receive either anesthesia with propofol and small dose of fentanyl (Group P) or anesthesia with thiopental and sevoflurane (Group S). Group P was induced with propofol 2-3 mg.kg-1 and fentanyl 0.1 mg and maintained with propofol 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 (from 10 mg.kg-1.h-1 by 2 mg.kg-1.h-1 decrement in interval of 10 minutes). No intravenous analgesic was added. Group S was induced with thiopental 4 -5 mg.kg-1 and maintained with sevoflurane 2-3%. We compared emergence time and the state of recovery 5 minutes after extubation and 5 minutes after entering the recovery room. There was no episode of inadequate anesthetic state in both groups. The emergence time was significantly shorter in Group P than in Group S. The state of recovery was much better in Group P compared with Group S in both 5 minutes after extubation and 5 minutes after entering the recovery room. Therefore, anesthesia with propofol and small dose of fentanyl at induction is more adequate compared with anesthesia with sevoflurane in laryngomicrosurgery.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Laryngomicrosurgery has some special characteristics. It is under much stress such as intubation and direct laryngoscopy during a short operation time. Therefore both adequate anesthesia and quick recovery are needed. Thirty three ASA physical status I patients for laryngomicrosurgery were randomly assigned to receive either anesthesia with propofol and small dose of fentanyl (Group P) or anesthesia with thiopental and sevoflurane (Group S). Group P was induced with propofol 2-3 mg.kg-1 and fentanyl 0.1 mg and maintained with propofol 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 (from 10 mg.kg-1.h-1 by 2 mg.kg-1.h-1 decrement in interval of 10 minutes). No intravenous analgesic was added. Group S was induced with thiopental 4 -5 mg.kg-1 and maintained with sevoflurane 2-3%. We compared emergence time and the state of recovery 5 minutes after extubation and 5 minutes after entering the recovery room. There was no episode of inadequate anesthetic state in both groups. The emergence time was significantly shorter in Group P than in Group S. The state of recovery was much better in Group P compared with Group S in both 5 minutes after extubation and 5 minutes after entering the recovery room. Therefore, anesthesia with propofol and small dose of fentanyl at induction is more adequate compared with anesthesia with sevoflurane in laryngomicrosurgery.
Key concepts: Propofol, Sevoflurane, Fentanyl, Anesthesia, Medicine, Anesthetic, Intubation, Laryngoscopy