1966•Thrombosis and HaemostasisRequires access

Platelet Adhesiveness: A Comparison of the Rotating Bulb and Glass-Bead Column Methods

Joseph Hirsh, J Mcbride, Helen Payling Wright

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

Summary A comparison was made of the rotating bulb and glass bead column methods of measuring platelet adhesiveness. Closely correlated results were obtained which suggest that the two methods measure the same aspect of platelet behaviour.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary A comparison was made of the rotating bulb and glass bead column methods of measuring platelet adhesiveness. Closely correlated results were obtained which suggest that the two methods measure the same aspect of platelet behaviour.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary A comparison was made of the rotating bulb and glass bead column methods of measuring platelet adhesiveness. Closely correlated results were obtained which suggest that the two methods measure the same aspect of platelet behaviour.

Key concepts: Bead, Bulb, Platelet adhesiveness, Column (typography), Platelet, Measure (data warehouse), Materials science, Biomedical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Platelet Adhesiveness: A Comparison of the Rotating Bulb and Glass-Bead Column Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens