2011PubMedRequires access

Validity of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein measurement when differentiating between benign and malignant pleural effusion.

Maribel Botana‐Rial, Pedro Casado-Rey, Virginia Leiro‐Fernández, María Amalia Andrade-Olivié, Cristina Represas‐Represas, Alberto Fernández‐Villar

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements in pleural fluid and plasma have been proposed to facilitate differential diagnosis of pleural effusion (PE). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of these measurements when differentiating between benign (BPE) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). METHODS: We prospectively studied 100 patients with the specific diagnosis of exudative PE. We analyzed the demographic data and the usual biochemical studies in PE. CRP and PCT were measured in pleural fluid and plasma before starting treatment. RESULTS: The CRP levels in pleural fluid were higher in patients with BPE than in patients with MPE [33.1 mg/L (16.8 to 52.1) vs. 11.8 (5.1 to 22); p = 0.001], as were the plasma CRP levels [68.4 mg/L (26.1 to 119.1) vs. 30.2 (11.7 to 64.8); p = 0.007]. No differences in PCT levels were detected between the two patient populations. The AUC derived from the ROC curve analysis for plasma CRP and pleural fluid CRP were 0.667 (CI 95%: 0.551 - 0.782) and 0.752 (CI 95%: 0.653 - 0.852), respectively. Plasma CRP levels > or = 35.5 mg/L exhibited 71% sensitivity and 56% specificity in discriminating between BPE and MPE. Pleural fluid CRP levels > or = 16.7 mg/L had 75% sensitivity and 68% specificity in the diagnosis of BPE. CONCLUSIONS: CRP levels in the pleural fluid and plasma were higher in patients with BPE, particulary infectious PE. However, the measurement of CRP and PCT is not a useful parameter for discriminating between BPE and MPE and does not provide useful information in clinical practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements in pleural fluid and plasma have been proposed to facilitate differential diagnosis of pleural effusion (PE). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of these measurements when differentiating between benign (BPE) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). METHODS: We prospectively studied 100 patients with the specific diagnosis of exudative PE. We analyzed the demographic data and the usual biochemical studies in PE. CRP and PCT were measured in pleural fluid and plasma before starting treatment. RESULTS: The CRP levels in pleural fluid were higher in patients with BPE than in patients with MPE [33.1 mg/L (16.8 to 52.1) vs. 11.8 (5.1 to 22); p = 0.001], as were the plasma CRP levels [68.4 mg/L (26.1 to 119.1) vs. 30.2 (11.7 to 64.8); p = 0.007]. No differences in PCT levels were detected between the two patient populations. The AUC derived from the ROC curve analysis for plasma CRP and pleural fluid CRP were 0.667 (CI 95%: 0.551 - 0.782) and 0.752 (CI 95%: 0.653 - 0.852), respectively. Plasma CRP levels > or = 35.5 mg/L exhibited 71% sensitivity and 56% specificity in discriminating between BPE and MPE. Pleural fluid CRP levels > or = 16.7 mg/L had 75% sensitivity and 68% specificity in the diagnosis of BPE. CONCLUSIONS: CRP levels in the pleural fluid and plasma were higher in patients with BPE, particulary infectious PE. However, the measurement of CRP and PCT is not a useful parameter for discriminating between BPE and MPE and does not provide useful information in clinical practice.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements in pleural fluid and plasma have been proposed to facilitate differential diagnosis of pleural effusion (PE). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of these measurements when differentiating between benign (BPE) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). METHODS: We prospectively studied 100 patients with the specific diagnosis of exudative PE. We analyzed the demographic data and the usual biochemical studies in PE. CRP and PCT were measured in pleural fluid and plasma before starting treatment. RESULTS: The CRP levels in pleural fluid were higher in patients with BPE than in patients with MPE [33.1 mg/L (16.8 to 52.1) vs. 11.8 (5.1 to 22); p = 0.001], as were the plasma CRP levels [68.4 mg/L (26.1 to 119.1) vs. 30.2 (11.7 to 64.8); p = 0.007]. No differences in PCT levels were detected between the two patient populations. The AUC derived from the ROC curve analysis for plasma CRP and pleural fluid CRP were 0.667 (CI 95%: 0.551 - 0.782) and 0.752 (CI 95%: 0.653 - 0.852), respectively. Plasma CRP levels > or = 35.5 mg/L exhibited 71% sensitivity and 56% specificity in discriminating between BPE and MPE. Pleural fluid CRP levels > or = 16.7 mg/L had 75% sensitivity and 68% specificity in the diagnosis of BPE. CONCLUSIONS: CRP levels in the pleural fluid and plasma were higher in patients with BPE, particulary infectious PE. However, the measurement of CRP and PCT is not a useful parameter for discriminating between BPE and MPE and does not provide useful information in clinical practice.

Key concepts: Procalcitonin, Medicine, Pleural effusion, Pleural fluid, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, C-reactive protein, Differential diagnosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Validity of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein measurement when differentiating between benign and malignant pleural effusion. — Research Paper | ScholarLens