2006•PubMedRequires access

The role of imaging methods in identifying the causes of extrahepatic cholestasis.

Ion Rogoveanu, Dan Ionuț Gheonea, Adrian Săftoiu, Tudorel Ciurea

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Transabdominal ultrasonography is the first choice examination used for the etiological diagnosis of extrahepatic cholestasis because it is a noninvasive, rapid method and presently widely accessible. In this article we discuss the accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in detecting the main causes of extrahepatic colestasis. Although in bile duct pathology, and especially in the evaluation of patients with jaundice, transabdominal ultrasonography is the first choice exploration, helicoidal CT, ERCP and MRCP are often required to establish the local cause of jaundice, local and distant consequences evaluation, appreciation of surgical intervention opportunity and choice of the right therapeutic method.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Transabdominal ultrasonography is the first choice examination used for the etiological diagnosis of extrahepatic cholestasis because it is a noninvasive, rapid method and presently widely accessible. In this article we discuss the accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in detecting the main causes of extrahepatic colestasis. Although in bile duct pathology, and especially in the evaluation of patients with jaundice, transabdominal ultrasonography is the first choice exploration, helicoidal CT, ERCP and MRCP are often required to establish the local cause of jaundice, local and distant consequences evaluation, appreciation of surgical intervention opportunity and choice of the right therapeutic method.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Transabdominal ultrasonography is the first choice examination used for the etiological diagnosis of extrahepatic cholestasis because it is a noninvasive, rapid method and presently widely accessible. In this article we discuss the accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in detecting the main causes of extrahepatic colestasis. Although in bile duct pathology, and especially in the evaluation of patients with jaundice, transabdominal ultrasonography is the first choice exploration, helicoidal CT, ERCP and MRCP are often required to establish the local cause of jaundice, local and distant consequences evaluation, appreciation of surgical intervention opportunity and choice of the right therapeutic method.

Key concepts: Medicine, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, Radiology, Ultrasonography, Cholestasis, Jaundice, Endoscopic ultrasonography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The role of imaging methods in identifying the causes of extrahepatic cholestasis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens