1991PubMedRequires access

[Comparison of the effects of nifedipine and diltiazem in patients with stable angina pectoris of various severity and pathomorphology of the coronary arteries].

Jaroslav Meluzı́n, Martin Novák, Hana Koukalová

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In a double blind 7-week randomized study the authors compared in 29 patients with stable angina the action of placebo, nifedipine and diltiazem. Nifedipine was administered in amounts of 60 mg/day for three weeks, diltiazem 270 mg/day also for three weeks. Nifedipine and diltiazem exerted a significant antianginous action in patients with occluded but collateralized coronary arteries (group A), as well as in patients without collaterals (group B). In both these groups diltiazem improved the load tolerance significantly more than nifedipine. Nifedipine and diltiazem were useful also in patients with mild (group E), medium (group D) and severe (group C) affections of the coronary arteries. Groups C and E differed significantly as to the different effect of nifedipine and diltiazem on load S-T depressions (in group C diltiazem was significantly more effective, in group E nifedipine was insignificantly better), and it was not possible to explain these differences by a different effect on Robinson's index. The authors conclude that neither nifedipine nor diltiazem led in the amounts used to the "steal phenomenon" with clinical impact. In patients with mild affections of the coronary arteries their antiischaemic and antianginous action was similar, in patients with severe affection of the coronary arteries diltiazem was more effective.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a double blind 7-week randomized study the authors compared in 29 patients with stable angina the action of placebo, nifedipine and diltiazem. Nifedipine was administered in amounts of 60 mg/day for three weeks, diltiazem 270 mg/day also for three weeks. Nifedipine and diltiazem exerted a significant antianginous action in patients with occluded but collateralized coronary arteries (group A), as well as in patients without collaterals (group B). In both these groups diltiazem improved the load tolerance significantly more than nifedipine. Nifedipine and diltiazem were useful also in patients with mild (group E), medium (group D) and severe (group C) affections of the coronary arteries. Groups C and E differed significantly as to the different effect of nifedipine and diltiazem on load S-T depressions (in group C diltiazem was significantly more effective, in group E nifedipine was insignificantly better), and it was not possible to explain these differences by a different effect on Robinson's index. The authors conclude that neither nifedipine nor diltiazem led in the amounts used to the "steal phenomenon" with clinical impact. In patients with mild affections of the coronary arteries their antiischaemic and antianginous action was similar, in patients with severe affection of the coronary arteries diltiazem was more effective.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a double blind 7-week randomized study the authors compared in 29 patients with stable angina the action of placebo, nifedipine and diltiazem. Nifedipine was administered in amounts of 60 mg/day for three weeks, diltiazem 270 mg/day also for three weeks. Nifedipine and diltiazem exerted a significant antianginous action in patients with occluded but collateralized coronary arteries (group A), as well as in patients without collaterals (group B). In both these groups diltiazem improved the load tolerance significantly more than nifedipine. Nifedipine and diltiazem were useful also in patients with mild (group E), medium (group D) and severe (group C) affections of the coronary arteries. Groups C and E differed significantly as to the different effect of nifedipine and diltiazem on load S-T depressions (in group C diltiazem was significantly more effective, in group E nifedipine was insignificantly better), and it was not possible to explain these differences by a different effect on Robinson's index. The authors conclude that neither nifedipine nor diltiazem led in the amounts used to the "steal phenomenon" with clinical impact. In patients with mild affections of the coronary arteries their antiischaemic and antianginous action was similar, in patients with severe affection of the coronary arteries diltiazem was more effective.

Key concepts: Diltiazem, Nifedipine, Medicine, Coronary arteries, Cardiology, Placebo, Angina, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison of the effects of nifedipine and diltiazem in patients with stable angina pectoris of various severity and pathomorphology of the coronary arteries]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens