1996•PubMedRequires access

Comparative study of the effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on generation and mobilization of neutrophils in cyclophosphamide-treated neutropenic mice.

Kunihiro Hattori, Tsukasa Orita, Masayoshi Oh‐eda, Mayuko Tamura, Maki Ono

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

To examine the differential in vivo effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on the recovery from neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, we directly compared the actions of these CSFs on neutrophil count in the bone marrow, spleen, and peripheral blood of mice treated with an anticancer drug, cyclophosphamide (CPA). Both G-CSF and GM-CSF stimulated the generation of neutrophils in bone marrow, but GM-CSF is only about 1/20 as effective as G-CSF. Both CSFs also stimulated the release of the generated neutrophils therefrom. G-CSF mobilized the neutrophils into both the circulation pool and the marginal pool, and these neutrophils were able to migrate into the inflammatory site when stimulated by casein. On the other hand, GM-CSF mobilize the neutrophils into the marginal pool but not the circulation pool, and they were not able to migrate into the inflammatory site. These findings indicate that G-CSF physiologically plays an important role as a factor which stimulates neutrophil mobilization from bone marrow into circulation as well as neutrophil generation in the bone marrow.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To examine the differential in vivo effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on the recovery from neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, we directly compared the actions of these CSFs on neutrophil count in the bone marrow, spleen, and peripheral blood of mice treated with an anticancer drug, cyclophosphamide (CPA). Both G-CSF and GM-CSF stimulated the generation of neutrophils in bone marrow, but GM-CSF is only about 1/20 as effective as G-CSF. Both CSFs also stimulated the release of the generated neutrophils therefrom. G-CSF mobilized the neutrophils into both the circulation pool and the marginal pool, and these neutrophils were able to migrate into the inflammatory site when stimulated by casein. On the other hand, GM-CSF mobilize the neutrophils into the marginal pool but not the circulation pool, and they were not able to migrate into the inflammatory site. These findings indicate that G-CSF physiologically plays an important role as a factor which stimulates neutrophil mobilization from bone marrow into circulation as well as neutrophil generation in the bone marrow.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To examine the differential in vivo effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on the recovery from neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, we directly compared the actions of these CSFs on neutrophil count in the bone marrow, spleen, and peripheral blood of mice treated with an anticancer drug, cyclophosphamide (CPA). Both G-CSF and GM-CSF stimulated the generation of neutrophils in bone marrow, but GM-CSF is only about 1/20 as effective as G-CSF. Both CSFs also stimulated the release of the generated neutrophils therefrom. G-CSF mobilized the neutrophils into both the circulation pool and the marginal pool, and these neutrophils were able to migrate into the inflammatory site when stimulated by casein. On the other hand, GM-CSF mobilize the neutrophils into the marginal pool but not the circulation pool, and they were not able to migrate into the inflammatory site. These findings indicate that G-CSF physiologically plays an important role as a factor which stimulates neutrophil mobilization from bone marrow into circulation as well as neutrophil generation in the bone marrow.

Key concepts: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, Granulocyte, Bone marrow, Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, Neutropenia, Colony-stimulating factor, Cyclophosphamide, Hematopoietic growth factor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of the effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on generation and mobilization of neutrophils in cyclophosphamide-treated neutropenic mice. — Research Paper | ScholarLens