2009PubMedRequires access

[A comparative study of three different rotary nickel titanium systems in the preparation of curved molar canals].

Gu Yx, Zhu Yq, Ran Du

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the shaping ability of three different rotary nickel-titanium instruments in curved molar canals. METHODS: Three groups of extracted molars that were balanced in terms of curvature were instrumented by M(two), rotary ProTaper and Hero642 nickel-titanium systems, respectively. The standard digital radiographs were taken to record the profiles of root canals and the positions of the tips of the instruments. At last, the curvature degrees and the apical transportation indexes (ATI) pre- and post instrumentation were compared. All the data were analyzed with SAS6.12 software package. RESULTS: Two Hero642 instruments fractured during preparation and none of the M(two) or rotary ProTaper instruments separated. The mean working time with Hero642 files was significantly longer than that with M(two) or ProTaper instruments (P<0.01).The change of curvature degree before and after instrumentation for three systems was statistically significant (P<0.05). And the difference of ATI for three systems was not significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: M(two) and ProTaper systems tested in this study are effective in shaping curved molar canals in extracted teeth.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To analyze the shaping ability of three different rotary nickel-titanium instruments in curved molar canals. METHODS: Three groups of extracted molars that were balanced in terms of curvature were instrumented by M(two), rotary ProTaper and Hero642 nickel-titanium systems, respectively. The standard digital radiographs were taken to record the profiles of root canals and the positions of the tips of the instruments. At last, the curvature degrees and the apical transportation indexes (ATI) pre- and post instrumentation were compared. All the data were analyzed with SAS6.12 software package. RESULTS: Two Hero642 instruments fractured during preparation and none of the M(two) or rotary ProTaper instruments separated. The mean working time with Hero642 files was significantly longer than that with M(two) or ProTaper instruments (P<0.01).The change of curvature degree before and after instrumentation for three systems was statistically significant (P<0.05). And the difference of ATI for three systems was not significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: M(two) and ProTaper systems tested in this study are effective in shaping curved molar canals in extracted teeth.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the shaping ability of three different rotary nickel-titanium instruments in curved molar canals. METHODS: Three groups of extracted molars that were balanced in terms of curvature were instrumented by M(two), rotary ProTaper and Hero642 nickel-titanium systems, respectively. The standard digital radiographs were taken to record the profiles of root canals and the positions of the tips of the instruments. At last, the curvature degrees and the apical transportation indexes (ATI) pre- and post instrumentation were compared. All the data were analyzed with SAS6.12 software package. RESULTS: Two Hero642 instruments fractured during preparation and none of the M(two) or rotary ProTaper instruments separated. The mean working time with Hero642 files was significantly longer than that with M(two) or ProTaper instruments (P<0.01).The change of curvature degree before and after instrumentation for three systems was statistically significant (P<0.05). And the difference of ATI for three systems was not significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: M(two) and ProTaper systems tested in this study are effective in shaping curved molar canals in extracted teeth.

Key concepts: Nickel titanium, Molar, Instrumentation (computer programming), Curvature, Significant difference, Mathematics, Dentistry, Orthodontics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[A comparative study of three different rotary nickel titanium systems in the preparation of curved molar canals]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens