1991PubMedRequires access

[Isolated proximal revascularization for double aorto-iliac and femoral lesions].

F Bacourt, Bernard Lenot, Olivier Goëau-Brissonnière, Fabien Koskas

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

From 1980 to 1990, 101 limbs were revascularized at the upper level only in 67 patients, while they presented with associated aortoiliac and femoral obstructive lesions. The symptoms disappeared after aortofemoral revascularization in 94% of the limbs operated on for claudication and 80% of those operated on for critic ischemia. Surgery of the deep femoral artery was associated in 51% of all cases. The average time lapse is 58 months. No complementary revascularization was needed in the cases of claudication. Out of the patients operated on for critic ischemia, upper revascularization was insufficient in 8 cases. Two of the operated patients were cured after secondary downstream revascularization (4%). Three operated patients still presented with intermittent claudication (6%), and 3 were amputed due to acute iliac obstruction seen at an advanced stage. As no reliable predictive test is available, we find it justified to carry out only upper revascularisation in most cases and to decide on the need for secondary downstream extension according to the clinical outcome. However, simultaneous revascularization at both levels is required in case of extensive involvement of the deep femoral artery, such as observed in only 5 of the patients operated during the same period.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

From 1980 to 1990, 101 limbs were revascularized at the upper level only in 67 patients, while they presented with associated aortoiliac and femoral obstructive lesions. The symptoms disappeared after aortofemoral revascularization in 94% of the limbs operated on for claudication and 80% of those operated on for critic ischemia. Surgery of the deep femoral artery was associated in 51% of all cases. The average time lapse is 58 months. No complementary revascularization was needed in the cases of claudication. Out of the patients operated on for critic ischemia, upper revascularization was insufficient in 8 cases. Two of the operated patients were cured after secondary downstream revascularization (4%). Three operated patients still presented with intermittent claudication (6%), and 3 were amputed due to acute iliac obstruction seen at an advanced stage. As no reliable predictive test is available, we find it justified to carry out only upper revascularisation in most cases and to decide on the need for secondary downstream extension according to the clinical outcome. However, simultaneous revascularization at both levels is required in case of extensive involvement of the deep femoral artery, such as observed in only 5 of the patients operated during the same period.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

From 1980 to 1990, 101 limbs were revascularized at the upper level only in 67 patients, while they presented with associated aortoiliac and femoral obstructive lesions. The symptoms disappeared after aortofemoral revascularization in 94% of the limbs operated on for claudication and 80% of those operated on for critic ischemia. Surgery of the deep femoral artery was associated in 51% of all cases. The average time lapse is 58 months. No complementary revascularization was needed in the cases of claudication. Out of the patients operated on for critic ischemia, upper revascularization was insufficient in 8 cases. Two of the operated patients were cured after secondary downstream revascularization (4%). Three operated patients still presented with intermittent claudication (6%), and 3 were amputed due to acute iliac obstruction seen at an advanced stage. As no reliable predictive test is available, we find it justified to carry out only upper revascularisation in most cases and to decide on the need for secondary downstream extension according to the clinical outcome. However, simultaneous revascularization at both levels is required in case of extensive involvement of the deep femoral artery, such as observed in only 5 of the patients operated during the same period.

Key concepts: Medicine, Revascularization, Claudication, Surgery, Deep Femoral Artery, Intermittent claudication, Ischemia, Femoral artery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Isolated proximal revascularization for double aorto-iliac and femoral lesions]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens