1989•PubMedRequires access

[Treatment of stenoses of the urethra. 2].

Michel Hermanowicz, D Rossi, N Daou, Jean J. Pinot, Gérard Serment, J Ducassou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This is a comparative study in 183 patients of the treatment of urethral stenoses by two-stage urethroplasty, internal endoscopic urethrotomy and urethrotomy via the Olbert catheter. Urethroplasty (39 patients) was preferentially carried out in patients with moniliform stenosis greater than 2 cm long in the penile and penoscrotal urethra. There was no significant difference in the indications for the two forms of urethrotomy. Good results were obtained for the 3 techniques in about 80% of cases but there was significantly higher complication rate with surgical urethroplasty. The failure rate of the 3 techniques did not differ significantly. The cost of treatment, on the other hand, greatly differed depending on the technique. Surgical urethroplasty was 2.8 times more costly than internal endoscopic urethrotomy and 10.4 times more costly than Olbert catheter urethrotomy. Olbert catheter urethrothomy was 3.7 times cheaper than internal endoscopic urethrotomy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This is a comparative study in 183 patients of the treatment of urethral stenoses by two-stage urethroplasty, internal endoscopic urethrotomy and urethrotomy via the Olbert catheter. Urethroplasty (39 patients) was preferentially carried out in patients with moniliform stenosis greater than 2 cm long in the penile and penoscrotal urethra. There was no significant difference in the indications for the two forms of urethrotomy. Good results were obtained for the 3 techniques in about 80% of cases but there was significantly higher complication rate with surgical urethroplasty. The failure rate of the 3 techniques did not differ significantly. The cost of treatment, on the other hand, greatly differed depending on the technique. Surgical urethroplasty was 2.8 times more costly than internal endoscopic urethrotomy and 10.4 times more costly than Olbert catheter urethrotomy. Olbert catheter urethrothomy was 3.7 times cheaper than internal endoscopic urethrotomy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This is a comparative study in 183 patients of the treatment of urethral stenoses by two-stage urethroplasty, internal endoscopic urethrotomy and urethrotomy via the Olbert catheter. Urethroplasty (39 patients) was preferentially carried out in patients with moniliform stenosis greater than 2 cm long in the penile and penoscrotal urethra. There was no significant difference in the indications for the two forms of urethrotomy. Good results were obtained for the 3 techniques in about 80% of cases but there was significantly higher complication rate with surgical urethroplasty. The failure rate of the 3 techniques did not differ significantly. The cost of treatment, on the other hand, greatly differed depending on the technique. Surgical urethroplasty was 2.8 times more costly than internal endoscopic urethrotomy and 10.4 times more costly than Olbert catheter urethrotomy. Olbert catheter urethrothomy was 3.7 times cheaper than internal endoscopic urethrotomy.

Key concepts: Urethroplasty, Urethrotomy, Urethra, Medicine, Catheter, Surgery, Urethral stricture, Stenosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Treatment of stenoses of the urethra. 2]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens