1996•PubMedRequires access

Accuracy of cephalometry in measurements of postoperative migration of the maxilla after Le Fort I osteotomy.

G Wall, Bo Rosenquist

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of cephalometry when point A is used to assess the migration of the maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy. In 10 consecutive patients, postoperative migration of the maxilla was studied by means of cephalometry and x-ray stereometry. Because the precision and accuracy of the x-ray stereometric method are known to be high, this method was used as a norm against which the results obtained by cephalometry were compared. The values of postoperative migration obtained by cephalometric analysis exceeded the corresponding values obtained by x-ray stereometry in all but four recordings. In 16 of 40 recordings, migration in opposite directions was found. The differences were statistically significant. Cephalometric analysis may be an inaccurate tool for postoperative follow-up of minor segment migration such as that usually found after osteotomies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of cephalometry when point A is used to assess the migration of the maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy. In 10 consecutive patients, postoperative migration of the maxilla was studied by means of cephalometry and x-ray stereometry. Because the precision and accuracy of the x-ray stereometric method are known to be high, this method was used as a norm against which the results obtained by cephalometry were compared. The values of postoperative migration obtained by cephalometric analysis exceeded the corresponding values obtained by x-ray stereometry in all but four recordings. In 16 of 40 recordings, migration in opposite directions was found. The differences were statistically significant. Cephalometric analysis may be an inaccurate tool for postoperative follow-up of minor segment migration such as that usually found after osteotomies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of cephalometry when point A is used to assess the migration of the maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy. In 10 consecutive patients, postoperative migration of the maxilla was studied by means of cephalometry and x-ray stereometry. Because the precision and accuracy of the x-ray stereometric method are known to be high, this method was used as a norm against which the results obtained by cephalometry were compared. The values of postoperative migration obtained by cephalometric analysis exceeded the corresponding values obtained by x-ray stereometry in all but four recordings. In 16 of 40 recordings, migration in opposite directions was found. The differences were statistically significant. Cephalometric analysis may be an inaccurate tool for postoperative follow-up of minor segment migration such as that usually found after osteotomies.

Key concepts: Maxilla, Cephalometry, Medicine, Cephalometric analysis, Orthodontics, Osteotomy, Dentistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Accuracy of cephalometry in measurements of postoperative migration of the maxilla after Le Fort I osteotomy. — Research Paper | ScholarLens