1993PubMedRequires access

Masseter muscle reflex evoked by tapping on osseointegrated Frialit implants.

U Stuge, Pål Brodin, Tore Bjørnland

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Comparison was made of the masseter muscle reflexes evoked by tapping on osseointegrated single-tooth aluminum oxide implants, and on natural teeth in nine patients. Tapping on eight out of nine patients evoked an inhibitory masseter muscle reflex, whereas tapping on all of the natural teeth evoked an inhibitory reflex. The threshold for this reflex was clearly elevated in implants compared to natural teeth. The pathway for the impulses responsible for this reflex and the clinical implications of the elevated threshold are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Comparison was made of the masseter muscle reflexes evoked by tapping on osseointegrated single-tooth aluminum oxide implants, and on natural teeth in nine patients. Tapping on eight out of nine patients evoked an inhibitory masseter muscle reflex, whereas tapping on all of the natural teeth evoked an inhibitory reflex. The threshold for this reflex was clearly elevated in implants compared to natural teeth. The pathway for the impulses responsible for this reflex and the clinical implications of the elevated threshold are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Comparison was made of the masseter muscle reflexes evoked by tapping on osseointegrated single-tooth aluminum oxide implants, and on natural teeth in nine patients. Tapping on eight out of nine patients evoked an inhibitory masseter muscle reflex, whereas tapping on all of the natural teeth evoked an inhibitory reflex. The threshold for this reflex was clearly elevated in implants compared to natural teeth. The pathway for the impulses responsible for this reflex and the clinical implications of the elevated threshold are discussed.

Key concepts: Jaw jerk reflex, Tapping, Masseter muscle, Reflex, Medicine, Inhibitory postsynaptic potential, Osseointegration, Dentistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Masseter muscle reflex evoked by tapping on osseointegrated Frialit implants. — Research Paper | ScholarLens