Masseter muscle reflex evoked by tapping on osseointegrated Frialit implants.
U Stuge, Pål Brodin, Tore Bjørnland
Abstract
U Stuge, Pål Brodin, Tore Bjørnland
Abstract
Comparison was made of the masseter muscle reflexes evoked by tapping on osseointegrated single-tooth aluminum oxide implants, and on natural teeth in nine patients. Tapping on eight out of nine patients evoked an inhibitory masseter muscle reflex, whereas tapping on all of the natural teeth evoked an inhibitory reflex. The threshold for this reflex was clearly elevated in implants compared to natural teeth. The pathway for the impulses responsible for this reflex and the clinical implications of the elevated threshold are discussed.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Comparison was made of the masseter muscle reflexes evoked by tapping on osseointegrated single-tooth aluminum oxide implants, and on natural teeth in nine patients. Tapping on eight out of nine patients evoked an inhibitory masseter muscle reflex, whereas tapping on all of the natural teeth evoked an inhibitory reflex. The threshold for this reflex was clearly elevated in implants compared to natural teeth. The pathway for the impulses responsible for this reflex and the clinical implications of the elevated threshold are discussed.
Key concepts: Jaw jerk reflex, Tapping, Masseter muscle, Reflex, Medicine, Inhibitory postsynaptic potential, Osseointegration, Dentistry