1981PubMedRequires access

[Resistance to griseofulvin (author's transl)].

D. Hantschke, H. Götz

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The antibiotic griseofulvin has been used for more than two decades in the treatment of dermatophyte-induced mycoses. During the first 10 years of use griseofulvin-resistant dermatophytes were demonstrated only in a few cases. During the seventies we did not find an increase in these strains. During this period of time the total number of dermatophytes studied by us was 489 of which 5 proved resistant, that is 4 strains of Trichophyton rubrum and one strain of Trichophyton mentagrophytes, which were still growing at a concentration of 100 gamma griseofulvin per ml culture medium. We consider these strains to have a secondary resistance and did not observe dermatophytes with a primary resistance. Accordingly, the number of non-responders cannot generally be explained by the presence of resistant dermatophytes, but rather by other reasons which have already been discussed. For the time being the problem of an increasing incidence of griseofulvin-resistant dermatophytes does not exist.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The antibiotic griseofulvin has been used for more than two decades in the treatment of dermatophyte-induced mycoses. During the first 10 years of use griseofulvin-resistant dermatophytes were demonstrated only in a few cases. During the seventies we did not find an increase in these strains. During this period of time the total number of dermatophytes studied by us was 489 of which 5 proved resistant, that is 4 strains of Trichophyton rubrum and one strain of Trichophyton mentagrophytes, which were still growing at a concentration of 100 gamma griseofulvin per ml culture medium. We consider these strains to have a secondary resistance and did not observe dermatophytes with a primary resistance. Accordingly, the number of non-responders cannot generally be explained by the presence of resistant dermatophytes, but rather by other reasons which have already been discussed. For the time being the problem of an increasing incidence of griseofulvin-resistant dermatophytes does not exist.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The antibiotic griseofulvin has been used for more than two decades in the treatment of dermatophyte-induced mycoses. During the first 10 years of use griseofulvin-resistant dermatophytes were demonstrated only in a few cases. During the seventies we did not find an increase in these strains. During this period of time the total number of dermatophytes studied by us was 489 of which 5 proved resistant, that is 4 strains of Trichophyton rubrum and one strain of Trichophyton mentagrophytes, which were still growing at a concentration of 100 gamma griseofulvin per ml culture medium. We consider these strains to have a secondary resistance and did not observe dermatophytes with a primary resistance. Accordingly, the number of non-responders cannot generally be explained by the presence of resistant dermatophytes, but rather by other reasons which have already been discussed. For the time being the problem of an increasing incidence of griseofulvin-resistant dermatophytes does not exist.

Key concepts: Griseofulvin, Dermatophyte, Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton, Microbiology, Antibiotics, Strain (injury), Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Resistance to griseofulvin (author's transl)]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens