1999PubMedRequires access

[Deletion analysis and functional studies of the promoter from commelina yellow mottle virus].

Bin Wu, Ran Pan, Ruifang Lu, Yongqiang Tian

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Commelina Yellow Mottle Virus(CoYMV) is a double-stranded, circular DNA virus and its promoter could direct GUS gene specifically expressing in phloem tissue of transgenic tobacco plants. To determine the optimal promoter sequence for pholem-specific gene expression, CoYMV promoter was deleted from its 5 end to form promoter fragments with 5 different lengths. Chimeric GUS genes were constructed using the promoter deletion based on the binary vector pBI121. Transgenic tobacco plants evidenced by PCR analysis were obtained with each kind of chimeric GUS gene structure by Agrobacterium mediated transformation. The results of GUS activity assay and histo-chemical staining showed that most of the chimeric GUS genes were expressed in transgenic plants. The GUS activity with the promoter deleted to -870 bp was about 78% higher than that of the full length promoter(1040 bp) and was a little higher than that of the promoter deleted to -585 bp, but the difference is not significant. The GUS activity reduced significantly when the promoter was deleted to -447 bp or -232 bp, whereas the property of phloem-specific expression pattern was still retained. When the promoter was deleted to -44 bp, just upstream adjacent to the TATA box, its tissue-specificity was lost and the activity was reduced to undetectable level. These results suggest that the region between -870 bp-232 bp and downstream of -232 bp of CoYMV promoter could be responsible for promoter activity and tissue specific expression, respectively. A negative regulation sequence might exist upstream of -870 bp of the CoYMV promoter. Therefore, we recommend that the optional CoYMV promoter sequence for phloem specific expression could be downstream from -870 bp or -585 bp. In comparison with CaMV 35S promoter, the GUS activity when driven by -870 bp CoYMV promoter was about 70% of that when driven by the 35S promoter. Considering the fact that 35S promoter-GUS gene is constitutively expressed, while the CoYMV promoter-GUS gene is expressed only in phloem tissues, the activity of the latter in phloem may be the same with or even higher than that of the 35S promoter.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Commelina Yellow Mottle Virus(CoYMV) is a double-stranded, circular DNA virus and its promoter could direct GUS gene specifically expressing in phloem tissue of transgenic tobacco plants. To determine the optimal promoter sequence for pholem-specific gene expression, CoYMV promoter was deleted from its 5 end to form promoter fragments with 5 different lengths. Chimeric GUS genes were constructed using the promoter deletion based on the binary vector pBI121. Transgenic tobacco plants evidenced by PCR analysis were obtained with each kind of chimeric GUS gene structure by Agrobacterium mediated transformation. The results of GUS activity assay and histo-chemical staining showed that most of the chimeric GUS genes were expressed in transgenic plants. The GUS activity with the promoter deleted to -870 bp was about 78% higher than that of the full length promoter(1040 bp) and was a little higher than that of the promoter deleted to -585 bp, but the difference is not significant. The GUS activity reduced significantly when the promoter was deleted to -447 bp or -232 bp, whereas the property of phloem-specific expression pattern was still retained. When the promoter was deleted to -44 bp, just upstream adjacent to the TATA box, its tissue-specificity was lost and the activity was reduced to undetectable level. These results suggest that the region between -870 bp-232 bp and downstream of -232 bp of CoYMV promoter could be responsible for promoter activity and tissue specific expression, respectively. A negative regulation sequence might exist upstream of -870 bp of the CoYMV promoter. Therefore, we recommend that the optional CoYMV promoter sequence for phloem specific expression could be downstream from -870 bp or -585 bp. In comparison with CaMV 35S promoter, the GUS activity when driven by -870 bp CoYMV promoter was about 70% of that when driven by the 35S promoter. Considering the fact that 35S promoter-GUS gene is constitutively expressed, while the CoYMV promoter-GUS gene is expressed only in phloem tissues, the activity of the latter in phloem may be the same with or even higher than that of the 35S promoter.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Commelina Yellow Mottle Virus(CoYMV) is a double-stranded, circular DNA virus and its promoter could direct GUS gene specifically expressing in phloem tissue of transgenic tobacco plants. To determine the optimal promoter sequence for pholem-specific gene expression, CoYMV promoter was deleted from its 5 end to form promoter fragments with 5 different lengths. Chimeric GUS genes were constructed using the promoter deletion based on the binary vector pBI121. Transgenic tobacco plants evidenced by PCR analysis were obtained with each kind of chimeric GUS gene structure by Agrobacterium mediated transformation. The results of GUS activity assay and histo-chemical staining showed that most of the chimeric GUS genes were expressed in transgenic plants. The GUS activity with the promoter deleted to -870 bp was about 78% higher than that of the full length promoter(1040 bp) and was a little higher than that of the promoter deleted to -585 bp, but the difference is not significant. The GUS activity reduced significantly when the promoter was deleted to -447 bp or -232 bp, whereas the property of phloem-specific expression pattern was still retained. When the promoter was deleted to -44 bp, just upstream adjacent to the TATA box, its tissue-specificity was lost and the activity was reduced to undetectable level. These results suggest that the region between -870 bp-232 bp and downstream of -232 bp of CoYMV promoter could be responsible for promoter activity and tissue specific expression, respectively. A negative regulation sequence might exist upstream of -870 bp of the CoYMV promoter. Therefore, we recommend that the optional CoYMV promoter sequence for phloem specific expression could be downstream from -870 bp or -585 bp. In comparison with CaMV 35S promoter, the GUS activity when driven by -870 bp CoYMV promoter was about 70% of that when driven by the 35S promoter. Considering the fact that 35S promoter-GUS gene is constitutively expressed, while the CoYMV promoter-GUS gene is expressed only in phloem tissues, the activity of the latter in phloem may be the same with or even higher than that of the 35S promoter.

Key concepts: Biology, Promoter, Molecular biology, Gene, TATA box, Chimeric gene, Transgene, Transformation (genetics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Deletion analysis and functional studies of the promoter from commelina yellow mottle virus]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens