1996PubMedRequires access

A comparative study of double contrast barium enema and colonoscopy for evaluation of rectal bleeding in children.

Aggarwal, Mittal Sk, N Kumar, Chowdhury

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

In pediatric age group, rectal bleeding is both common and distressing. Unlike in adults, very few studies comparing diagnostic efficacy of double contrast barium enema (DCBE) and Colonoscopy are available in children. A prospective study was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of high quality DCBE against colonoscopy in children with overt rectal bleeding. Fourty four children underwent flexible colonoscopy and DCBE independently. The final diagnosis was made after considering all investigations. Against this gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of DCBE were 66.66% and 100% while that of colonoscopy 74.35% and 100% respectively. When assessing polypoidal lesions of colon, diagnostic yield of enema study was 86.20% as compared to 72.41% with colonoscopy. In colitis cases, the similar figures for enema and endoscopy were 53.84% and 76.92% respectively. The observed differences were statistically insignificant. No significant preparation, premedication or procedure related complications were encountered. The study thus highlights the utility and complementary role of DCBE and colonoscopy for evaluation of children with rectal bleeding.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In pediatric age group, rectal bleeding is both common and distressing. Unlike in adults, very few studies comparing diagnostic efficacy of double contrast barium enema (DCBE) and Colonoscopy are available in children. A prospective study was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of high quality DCBE against colonoscopy in children with overt rectal bleeding. Fourty four children underwent flexible colonoscopy and DCBE independently. The final diagnosis was made after considering all investigations. Against this gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of DCBE were 66.66% and 100% while that of colonoscopy 74.35% and 100% respectively. When assessing polypoidal lesions of colon, diagnostic yield of enema study was 86.20% as compared to 72.41% with colonoscopy. In colitis cases, the similar figures for enema and endoscopy were 53.84% and 76.92% respectively. The observed differences were statistically insignificant. No significant preparation, premedication or procedure related complications were encountered. The study thus highlights the utility and complementary role of DCBE and colonoscopy for evaluation of children with rectal bleeding.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In pediatric age group, rectal bleeding is both common and distressing. Unlike in adults, very few studies comparing diagnostic efficacy of double contrast barium enema (DCBE) and Colonoscopy are available in children. A prospective study was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of high quality DCBE against colonoscopy in children with overt rectal bleeding. Fourty four children underwent flexible colonoscopy and DCBE independently. The final diagnosis was made after considering all investigations. Against this gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of DCBE were 66.66% and 100% while that of colonoscopy 74.35% and 100% respectively. When assessing polypoidal lesions of colon, diagnostic yield of enema study was 86.20% as compared to 72.41% with colonoscopy. In colitis cases, the similar figures for enema and endoscopy were 53.84% and 76.92% respectively. The observed differences were statistically insignificant. No significant preparation, premedication or procedure related complications were encountered. The study thus highlights the utility and complementary role of DCBE and colonoscopy for evaluation of children with rectal bleeding.

Key concepts: Medicine, Colonoscopy, Barium enema, Double-contrast barium enema, Gold standard (test), Enema, Premedication, Endoscopy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of double contrast barium enema and colonoscopy for evaluation of rectal bleeding in children. — Research Paper | ScholarLens