1989PubMedRequires access

Splenic function after splenectomy for trauma. Role of autotransplantation and splenosis.

Lüdtke Fe, Mack Sc, P. Schuff‐Werner, E Voth

Open publisher page 37 citations

Abstract

Follow-up of patients treated for severe trauma to the spleen, with autotransplantation (20 cases) or splenectomy (21 cases) included hepatic and splenic scintigraphy, intracutaneous skin testing with seven recall antigens and hematologic studies (red and white blood count, Howell-Jolly bodies, erythrocyte morphology, immunoglobulins, complements). In all reimplantation cases splenic tissue was scintigraphically demonstrated. After removal of the spleen due to severe traumatic ruptures the incidence of splenosis was 66%. Good clearance function in all reimplantation and splenosis cases was demonstrated by Howell-Jolly bodies and erythrocyte morphology. Autotransplantation of splenic tissue is a simple and safe procedure, without serious complications. As yet, however, there is no proof that it provides adequate resistance to infections. Reimplantation, therefore, should be performed only if spleen-preserving procedures are not feasible.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Follow-up of patients treated for severe trauma to the spleen, with autotransplantation (20 cases) or splenectomy (21 cases) included hepatic and splenic scintigraphy, intracutaneous skin testing with seven recall antigens and hematologic studies (red and white blood count, Howell-Jolly bodies, erythrocyte morphology, immunoglobulins, complements). In all reimplantation cases splenic tissue was scintigraphically demonstrated. After removal of the spleen due to severe traumatic ruptures the incidence of splenosis was 66%. Good clearance function in all reimplantation and splenosis cases was demonstrated by Howell-Jolly bodies and erythrocyte morphology. Autotransplantation of splenic tissue is a simple and safe procedure, without serious complications. As yet, however, there is no proof that it provides adequate resistance to infections. Reimplantation, therefore, should be performed only if spleen-preserving procedures are not feasible.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Follow-up of patients treated for severe trauma to the spleen, with autotransplantation (20 cases) or splenectomy (21 cases) included hepatic and splenic scintigraphy, intracutaneous skin testing with seven recall antigens and hematologic studies (red and white blood count, Howell-Jolly bodies, erythrocyte morphology, immunoglobulins, complements). In all reimplantation cases splenic tissue was scintigraphically demonstrated. After removal of the spleen due to severe traumatic ruptures the incidence of splenosis was 66%. Good clearance function in all reimplantation and splenosis cases was demonstrated by Howell-Jolly bodies and erythrocyte morphology. Autotransplantation of splenic tissue is a simple and safe procedure, without serious complications. As yet, however, there is no proof that it provides adequate resistance to infections. Reimplantation, therefore, should be performed only if spleen-preserving procedures are not feasible.

Key concepts: Medicine, Autotransplantation, Splenectomy, Spleen, Surgery, Scintigraphy, Transplantation, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Splenic function after splenectomy for trauma. Role of autotransplantation and splenosis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens