Mucosa protectives: sucralfate and colloidal bismuth subcitrate in peptic ulcer disease.
Guido N.J. Tytgat, C. Yung Nio
Abstract
Guido N.J. Tytgat, C. Yung Nio
Abstract
Mucosa protective drugs are thought to have an important role in the treatment of both duodenal (DU) and gastric ulcer (GU) disease by means of correcting the disturbed defensive factors. Sucralfate as well as colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS) form a layer on the ulcer base and in this way protect the ulcer from acid, peptic activity and bile. In duodenal ulcer sucralfate and CBS have shown a significant difference in healing rate compared with placebo. The same holds true for gastric ulcer. When compared with H2-receptor antagonists the healing rates obtained with sucralfate are rather similar. The data obtained with CBS tend to be superior. Also the scores for symptomatic improvement are indistinguishable compared to that seen with H2-receptor antagonists. Especially after CBS the relapse rates of both DU and GU appear less and delayed. Mucosa protective agents are to be considered as valid alternatives to the H2-receptor antagonists.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Mucosa protective drugs are thought to have an important role in the treatment of both duodenal (DU) and gastric ulcer (GU) disease by means of correcting the disturbed defensive factors. Sucralfate as well as colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS) form a layer on the ulcer base and in this way protect the ulcer from acid, peptic activity and bile. In duodenal ulcer sucralfate and CBS have shown a significant difference in healing rate compared with placebo. The same holds true for gastric ulcer. When compared with H2-receptor antagonists the healing rates obtained with sucralfate are rather similar. The data obtained with CBS tend to be superior. Also the scores for symptomatic improvement are indistinguishable compared to that seen with H2-receptor antagonists. Especially after CBS the relapse rates of both DU and GU appear less and delayed. Mucosa protective agents are to be considered as valid alternatives to the H2-receptor antagonists.
Key concepts: Sucralfate, Gastroenterology, Medicine, Internal medicine, Peptic ulcer, Duodenal ulcer, Placebo, Gastric mucosa