1996PubMedRequires access

[Can we recognize the pathological character of the appendix during laparoscopy? Prospective study: 81 cases].

G Champault, Nabil P. Rizk, Marianne Ziol, N Taffinder, Catheline Jm

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

In a prospective study of 81 patients, the appendix was photographed during a laparoscopy performed for pain in the right iliac fossa. An appendicectomy was performed in 65 patients, for the remaining 16, another cause for the pain was found and the appendix was left in place. The evaluation of the photographed appendix was formed afterwards by a group of 10 surgeons and compared with the histopathological results. In 20 cases (30%) the appendix was normal. In 7 (10%) minimal mucosal inflammation was found and in 38 (60%) acute appendicitis. All the surgeons correctly recognised acute appendicitis. The accuracy of recognition of a normal appendix was 70% overall, and the maximum risk of leaving an early form of appendicitis to evolve was 14%. We propose not removing an appendix judged to be normal during laparoscopy if no other cause for the pain is found. A short course of antibiotics would cover the low risk of allowing a very early appendicitis to develop.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a prospective study of 81 patients, the appendix was photographed during a laparoscopy performed for pain in the right iliac fossa. An appendicectomy was performed in 65 patients, for the remaining 16, another cause for the pain was found and the appendix was left in place. The evaluation of the photographed appendix was formed afterwards by a group of 10 surgeons and compared with the histopathological results. In 20 cases (30%) the appendix was normal. In 7 (10%) minimal mucosal inflammation was found and in 38 (60%) acute appendicitis. All the surgeons correctly recognised acute appendicitis. The accuracy of recognition of a normal appendix was 70% overall, and the maximum risk of leaving an early form of appendicitis to evolve was 14%. We propose not removing an appendix judged to be normal during laparoscopy if no other cause for the pain is found. A short course of antibiotics would cover the low risk of allowing a very early appendicitis to develop.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a prospective study of 81 patients, the appendix was photographed during a laparoscopy performed for pain in the right iliac fossa. An appendicectomy was performed in 65 patients, for the remaining 16, another cause for the pain was found and the appendix was left in place. The evaluation of the photographed appendix was formed afterwards by a group of 10 surgeons and compared with the histopathological results. In 20 cases (30%) the appendix was normal. In 7 (10%) minimal mucosal inflammation was found and in 38 (60%) acute appendicitis. All the surgeons correctly recognised acute appendicitis. The accuracy of recognition of a normal appendix was 70% overall, and the maximum risk of leaving an early form of appendicitis to evolve was 14%. We propose not removing an appendix judged to be normal during laparoscopy if no other cause for the pain is found. A short course of antibiotics would cover the low risk of allowing a very early appendicitis to develop.

Key concepts: Appendix, Medicine, Appendicitis, Acute appendicitis, Laparoscopy, Iliac fossa, Prospective cohort study, General surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Can we recognize the pathological character of the appendix during laparoscopy? Prospective study: 81 cases]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens