The prescription of methadone for opiate dependence in Australia, 1985‐1991
Matt Gaughwin, Erich V. Kliewer, Robert Ali, Craig Faulkner, Alex Wodak, Geoff Anderson
Abstract
Matt Gaughwin, Erich V. Kliewer, Robert Ali, Craig Faulkner, Alex Wodak, Geoff Anderson
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the rates and patterns of prescription of methadone for opiate dependence in Australia from 1985 to 1991. DESIGN: Data on the numbers of Australians prescribed methadone in States and Territories were used to calculate prevalence rates of prescription of methadone. RESULTS: In 1985, Queensland had the highest rate of prescription of methadone. After the establishment of the National Campaign Against Drug Abuse, rates increased in most jurisdictions. Assessment procedures and prescribing practices, such as private prescription of methadone, appear to have markedly affected rates of prescription in some States. CONCLUSION: Large differences in rates of methadone prescription have occurred in Australian States and Territories. There are inadequate data to explain how rates of prescription are related to the prevalence of opiate use. Investigations of prevalence of injecting opiate use, demand for treatment and clinic practices are needed to explain these patterns fully.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the rates and patterns of prescription of methadone for opiate dependence in Australia from 1985 to 1991. DESIGN: Data on the numbers of Australians prescribed methadone in States and Territories were used to calculate prevalence rates of prescription of methadone. RESULTS: In 1985, Queensland had the highest rate of prescription of methadone. After the establishment of the National Campaign Against Drug Abuse, rates increased in most jurisdictions. Assessment procedures and prescribing practices, such as private prescription of methadone, appear to have markedly affected rates of prescription in some States. CONCLUSION: Large differences in rates of methadone prescription have occurred in Australian States and Territories. There are inadequate data to explain how rates of prescription are related to the prevalence of opiate use. Investigations of prevalence of injecting opiate use, demand for treatment and clinic practices are needed to explain these patterns fully.
Key concepts: Medical prescription, Methadone, Opiate, Medicine, Psychiatry, Demography, Pharmacology, Internal medicine