2009Unpublished venueOpen access

Quotient Complexity of Regular Languages

Janusz Brzozowski

Open full text 78 citations

Abstract

The past research on the state complexity of operations on regular languages is examined, and a new approach based on an old method (derivatives of regular expressions) is presented. Since state complexity is a property of a language, it is appropriate to define it in formal-language terms as the number of distinct left quotients of the language, and to call it "quotient complexity". Suppose f is a binary regular operation (for example, union or concatenation) and g, a unary regular operation (for example, star or reversal). Moreover, let K (respectively, L) range over all regular languages with quotient complexity m (respectively, n). We want to find the worst-case quotient complexity of f(K, L) as a function of m and n, or that of g(L) as a function of n. Since quotients can be represented by derivatives, one can find a formula for the typical quotient of f(K, L) or g(L) in terms of the quotients of K and L. To obtain an upper bound on the number of quotients of f(K, L) or g(L) all one has to do is count how many such quotients are possible, and this usually makes automaton constructions unnecessary. The advantages of this point of view are illustrated by many examples. Moreover, new general observations are presented to help in the estimation of upper bounds on quotient complexity of regular operations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The past research on the state complexity of operations on regular languages is examined, and a new approach based on an old method (derivatives of regular expressions) is presented. Since state complexity is a property of a language, it is appropriate to define it in formal-language terms as the number of distinct left quotients of the language, and to call it "quotient complexity". Suppose f is a binary regular operation (for example, union or concatenation) and g, a unary regular operation (for example, star or reversal). Moreover, let K (respectively, L) range over all regular languages with quotient complexity m (respectively, n). We want to find the worst-case quotient complexity of f(K, L) as a function of m and n, or that of g(L) as a function of n. Since quotients can be represented by derivatives, one can find a formula for the typical quotient of f(K, L) or g(L) in terms of the quotients of K and L. To obtain an upper bound on the number of quotients of f(K, L) or g(L) all one has to do is count how many such quotients are possible, and this usually makes automaton constructions unnecessary. The advantages of this point of view are illustrated by many examples. Moreover, new general observations are presented to help in the estimation of upper bounds on quotient complexity of regular operations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 78 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The past research on the state complexity of operations on regular languages is examined, and a new approach based on an old method (derivatives of regular expressions) is presented. Since state complexity is a property of a language, it is appropriate to define it in formal-language terms as the number of distinct left quotients of the language, and to call it "quotient complexity". Suppose f is a binary regular operation (for example, union or concatenation) and g, a unary regular operation (for example, star or reversal). Moreover, let K (respectively, L) range over all regular languages with quotient complexity m (respectively, n). We want to find the worst-case quotient complexity of f(K, L) as a function of m and n, or that of g(L) as a function of n. Since quotients can be represented by derivatives, one can find a formula for the typical quotient of f(K, L) or g(L) in terms of the quotients of K and L. To obtain an upper bound on the number of quotients of f(K, L) or g(L) all one has to do is count how many such quotients are possible, and this usually makes automaton constructions unnecessary. The advantages of this point of view are illustrated by many examples. Moreover, new general observations are presented to help in the estimation of upper bounds on quotient complexity of regular operations.

Key concepts: Quotient, Concatenation (mathematics), Regular language, Mathematics, Upper and lower bounds, Discrete mathematics, State (computer science), Formal language

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quotient Complexity of Regular Languages — Research Paper | ScholarLens