2005PubMedRequires access

[Fertility after treatment for ectopic pregnancy: evaluation of the switch from laparotomy to laparascopy].

Johannes J. van Beek, Esther Vollaard

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the switch in surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy from laparotomy to laparoscopy at the Sophia Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands. DESIGN: Retrospective. METHOD: Initially an ectopic pregnancy was treated by means of laparotomy at the Sophia Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands. At the end of 1996 laparoscopic treatment became the method of first choice. In 2003, all patients who received surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy in the period 1995-2001 were evaluated. As well as examining their medical records, all patients were questioned about the fertility outcome since the ectopic pregnancy. All of the patients could be traced and the response was 100%. RESULTS: In the study period 97 patients were operated on due to an ectopic pregnancy. The admission period was significantly shorter after laparoscopy compared to laparotomy. The complication rate in both groups was low. In total 78 (80%) of the patients still wanted to conceive. During the observation period, 94 pregnancies occurred in 61 patients. The pregnancy rates following laparotomy and laparoscopy were the same. After salpingostomy, the future fertility was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to salpingectomy. CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy is more advantageous for the patient compared to laparotomy: in our results this did not compromise future fertility. Salpingostomy was associated with an increased chance of later pregnancy compared to salpingectomy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the switch in surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy from laparotomy to laparoscopy at the Sophia Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands. DESIGN: Retrospective. METHOD: Initially an ectopic pregnancy was treated by means of laparotomy at the Sophia Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands. At the end of 1996 laparoscopic treatment became the method of first choice. In 2003, all patients who received surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy in the period 1995-2001 were evaluated. As well as examining their medical records, all patients were questioned about the fertility outcome since the ectopic pregnancy. All of the patients could be traced and the response was 100%. RESULTS: In the study period 97 patients were operated on due to an ectopic pregnancy. The admission period was significantly shorter after laparoscopy compared to laparotomy. The complication rate in both groups was low. In total 78 (80%) of the patients still wanted to conceive. During the observation period, 94 pregnancies occurred in 61 patients. The pregnancy rates following laparotomy and laparoscopy were the same. After salpingostomy, the future fertility was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to salpingectomy. CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy is more advantageous for the patient compared to laparotomy: in our results this did not compromise future fertility. Salpingostomy was associated with an increased chance of later pregnancy compared to salpingectomy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the switch in surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy from laparotomy to laparoscopy at the Sophia Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands. DESIGN: Retrospective. METHOD: Initially an ectopic pregnancy was treated by means of laparotomy at the Sophia Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands. At the end of 1996 laparoscopic treatment became the method of first choice. In 2003, all patients who received surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy in the period 1995-2001 were evaluated. As well as examining their medical records, all patients were questioned about the fertility outcome since the ectopic pregnancy. All of the patients could be traced and the response was 100%. RESULTS: In the study period 97 patients were operated on due to an ectopic pregnancy. The admission period was significantly shorter after laparoscopy compared to laparotomy. The complication rate in both groups was low. In total 78 (80%) of the patients still wanted to conceive. During the observation period, 94 pregnancies occurred in 61 patients. The pregnancy rates following laparotomy and laparoscopy were the same. After salpingostomy, the future fertility was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to salpingectomy. CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy is more advantageous for the patient compared to laparotomy: in our results this did not compromise future fertility. Salpingostomy was associated with an increased chance of later pregnancy compared to salpingectomy.

Key concepts: Laparotomy, Ectopic pregnancy, Medicine, Salpingostomy, Salpingectomy, Fertility, Laparoscopy, Pregnancy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Fertility after treatment for ectopic pregnancy: evaluation of the switch from laparotomy to laparascopy]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens