1988PubMedRequires access

Cephalosporin therapy in intra-abdominal infection: comparative studies of cefotetan, latamoxef and cefoxitin.

S E Wilson

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Two sequential randomised studies were performed to assess the efficacy of 3 different cephalosporins in the treatment of established intra-abdominal infections. In the first study 102 of 109 (94%) patients given cefotetan 2g iv every 12 hours had a satisfactory clinical response compared to 51 of 56 (91%) patients given latamoxef 2g iv every 8 hours. In the second study cefotetan 2g iv every 12 hours was compared to cefoxitin 2g iv every 6 hours with satisfactory clinical responses in 93 of 95 (98%) cefotetan-treated patients and 41 of 43 (95%) cefoxitin-treated patients. Overall response rates in the two studies were lower in patients with severe peritonitis (82%) or nosocomial infections (70%). Twelve-hourly dosing with cefotetan appears to be as effective and well tolerated in regional peritonitis as treatment with shorter-acting agents.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two sequential randomised studies were performed to assess the efficacy of 3 different cephalosporins in the treatment of established intra-abdominal infections. In the first study 102 of 109 (94%) patients given cefotetan 2g iv every 12 hours had a satisfactory clinical response compared to 51 of 56 (91%) patients given latamoxef 2g iv every 8 hours. In the second study cefotetan 2g iv every 12 hours was compared to cefoxitin 2g iv every 6 hours with satisfactory clinical responses in 93 of 95 (98%) cefotetan-treated patients and 41 of 43 (95%) cefoxitin-treated patients. Overall response rates in the two studies were lower in patients with severe peritonitis (82%) or nosocomial infections (70%). Twelve-hourly dosing with cefotetan appears to be as effective and well tolerated in regional peritonitis as treatment with shorter-acting agents.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two sequential randomised studies were performed to assess the efficacy of 3 different cephalosporins in the treatment of established intra-abdominal infections. In the first study 102 of 109 (94%) patients given cefotetan 2g iv every 12 hours had a satisfactory clinical response compared to 51 of 56 (91%) patients given latamoxef 2g iv every 8 hours. In the second study cefotetan 2g iv every 12 hours was compared to cefoxitin 2g iv every 6 hours with satisfactory clinical responses in 93 of 95 (98%) cefotetan-treated patients and 41 of 43 (95%) cefoxitin-treated patients. Overall response rates in the two studies were lower in patients with severe peritonitis (82%) or nosocomial infections (70%). Twelve-hourly dosing with cefotetan appears to be as effective and well tolerated in regional peritonitis as treatment with shorter-acting agents.

Key concepts: Cefotetan, Cefoxitin, Medicine, Moxalactam, Latamoxef, Cephalosporin, Peritonitis, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cephalosporin therapy in intra-abdominal infection: comparative studies of cefotetan, latamoxef and cefoxitin. — Research Paper | ScholarLens