1987•PubMedRequires access

[Antipneumococcal activity of erythromycin and spiramycin in 2 experimental models in mice].

Olivier Y. Rolin, Daniel H. Bouanchaud

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Macrolides often remain the first intention treatment in many chest infections caused by S. pneumoniae. Antipneumococcal activities of spiramycin and erythromycin have then been tested in a septicaemia model and in a pulmonary infection model in mice. In the septicaemia model, spiramycin has been found 5 to 15 times more active than erythromycin by subcutaneous route and 1.5 to 6 times by oral route. In the pneumonia model, spiramycin has been found as active (one strain) to 5 times more active than erythromycin (three strains) by both subcutaneous and oral route. These data might indicate that better tissular penetration of spiramycin is responsible for better in vivo activity. These facts also support the statement that MIC should not be the only choice standard of infectious chemotherapy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Macrolides often remain the first intention treatment in many chest infections caused by S. pneumoniae. Antipneumococcal activities of spiramycin and erythromycin have then been tested in a septicaemia model and in a pulmonary infection model in mice. In the septicaemia model, spiramycin has been found 5 to 15 times more active than erythromycin by subcutaneous route and 1.5 to 6 times by oral route. In the pneumonia model, spiramycin has been found as active (one strain) to 5 times more active than erythromycin (three strains) by both subcutaneous and oral route. These data might indicate that better tissular penetration of spiramycin is responsible for better in vivo activity. These facts also support the statement that MIC should not be the only choice standard of infectious chemotherapy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Macrolides often remain the first intention treatment in many chest infections caused by S. pneumoniae. Antipneumococcal activities of spiramycin and erythromycin have then been tested in a septicaemia model and in a pulmonary infection model in mice. In the septicaemia model, spiramycin has been found 5 to 15 times more active than erythromycin by subcutaneous route and 1.5 to 6 times by oral route. In the pneumonia model, spiramycin has been found as active (one strain) to 5 times more active than erythromycin (three strains) by both subcutaneous and oral route. These data might indicate that better tissular penetration of spiramycin is responsible for better in vivo activity. These facts also support the statement that MIC should not be the only choice standard of infectious chemotherapy.

Key concepts: Spiramycin, Erythromycin, Streptococcus pneumoniae, In vivo, Antibiotics, Microbiology, Pneumonia, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Antipneumococcal activity of erythromycin and spiramycin in 2 experimental models in mice]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens