1996PubMedRequires access

[Recording otoacoustic emissions in expert evaluation of chronic noise-induced hearing loss].

Plinkert Pk, H de Maddalena

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In order to assess occupational hearing loss, damage to outer hair cell function must be demonstrated. Measurements of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE) allow clinicians to investigate objectively the cochlear amplification process. In this prospective study, 50 persons with suspected occupational hearing losses were tested with pure-tone and speech audiometry. Additionally, TEOAE and DPAOE were determined. Significant linear correlations were observed when comparing hearing thresholds and speech discriminations with evoked emissions. Three groups were formed based on the OAE results: group A, TEOAE- and DPOAE-positive; group B, TEOAE-negative, DPOAE positive; group C, TEOAE- and DPOAE-negative. The groups were compared with regard to the weighted and simple discrimination scores and percentage of hearing loss computed according to the Boenninghaus-Röser tables. Analysis of variance showed significant differences in hearing losses among the three groups, allowing an objective statement to be made about the degree of work compromise: group A, < 10%; group B, 10-15% group C, > or = 20%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to assess occupational hearing loss, damage to outer hair cell function must be demonstrated. Measurements of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE) allow clinicians to investigate objectively the cochlear amplification process. In this prospective study, 50 persons with suspected occupational hearing losses were tested with pure-tone and speech audiometry. Additionally, TEOAE and DPAOE were determined. Significant linear correlations were observed when comparing hearing thresholds and speech discriminations with evoked emissions. Three groups were formed based on the OAE results: group A, TEOAE- and DPOAE-positive; group B, TEOAE-negative, DPOAE positive; group C, TEOAE- and DPOAE-negative. The groups were compared with regard to the weighted and simple discrimination scores and percentage of hearing loss computed according to the Boenninghaus-Röser tables. Analysis of variance showed significant differences in hearing losses among the three groups, allowing an objective statement to be made about the degree of work compromise: group A, < 10%; group B, 10-15% group C, > or = 20%.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to assess occupational hearing loss, damage to outer hair cell function must be demonstrated. Measurements of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE) allow clinicians to investigate objectively the cochlear amplification process. In this prospective study, 50 persons with suspected occupational hearing losses were tested with pure-tone and speech audiometry. Additionally, TEOAE and DPAOE were determined. Significant linear correlations were observed when comparing hearing thresholds and speech discriminations with evoked emissions. Three groups were formed based on the OAE results: group A, TEOAE- and DPOAE-positive; group B, TEOAE-negative, DPOAE positive; group C, TEOAE- and DPOAE-negative. The groups were compared with regard to the weighted and simple discrimination scores and percentage of hearing loss computed according to the Boenninghaus-Röser tables. Analysis of variance showed significant differences in hearing losses among the three groups, allowing an objective statement to be made about the degree of work compromise: group A, < 10%; group B, 10-15% group C, > or = 20%.

Key concepts: Audiology, Medicine, Pure tone audiometry, Otoacoustic emission, Noise-induced hearing loss, Hearing loss, Audiometry, Noise (video)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Recording otoacoustic emissions in expert evaluation of chronic noise-induced hearing loss]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens