1995PubMedRequires access

[Anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapy in deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism].

H K Nielsen, Jens Flensted Lassen, Hanne Berg Ravn, Steen Husted

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

During the last 10 years anticoagulant (AC) therapy and thrombolytic treatment of venous thromboembolism (VT) have been evaluated in randomized studies. Adjusted subcutaneous (s.c.) heparin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are found at least as effective as intravenous (i.v.) infusion of heparin in deep venous thrombosis (DVT) without an increased bleeding risk. In pulmonary embolism (PE) randomized trials assessing the efficacy of s.c. heparin and LMWH are missing. Oral AC-treatment can be initiated from the first or second day in VT. The recommended duration is three months for medical patients, and 4 weeks seem appropriate for surgical patients that are completely mobilized and without persisting predisposing factors. Long-term efficacy of thrombolytic treatment of DVT has only been assessed in small trials showing a trend towards reduced risk of developing chronic venous insufficiency. Short-term thrombolytic treatment of DVT is evaluated in ongoing trials. In the treatment of PE short-term thrombolysis with either t-PA or urokinase is found to be as effective as long-term thrombolytic treatment with a reduced bleeding risk. Thrombolytic therapy rapidly reduces embolic mass and stabilizes haemodynamics, but mortality and long-term efficacy of thrombolysis and AC-treatment versus AC-treatment alone in PE are being assessed in ongoing studies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During the last 10 years anticoagulant (AC) therapy and thrombolytic treatment of venous thromboembolism (VT) have been evaluated in randomized studies. Adjusted subcutaneous (s.c.) heparin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are found at least as effective as intravenous (i.v.) infusion of heparin in deep venous thrombosis (DVT) without an increased bleeding risk. In pulmonary embolism (PE) randomized trials assessing the efficacy of s.c. heparin and LMWH are missing. Oral AC-treatment can be initiated from the first or second day in VT. The recommended duration is three months for medical patients, and 4 weeks seem appropriate for surgical patients that are completely mobilized and without persisting predisposing factors. Long-term efficacy of thrombolytic treatment of DVT has only been assessed in small trials showing a trend towards reduced risk of developing chronic venous insufficiency. Short-term thrombolytic treatment of DVT is evaluated in ongoing trials. In the treatment of PE short-term thrombolysis with either t-PA or urokinase is found to be as effective as long-term thrombolytic treatment with a reduced bleeding risk. Thrombolytic therapy rapidly reduces embolic mass and stabilizes haemodynamics, but mortality and long-term efficacy of thrombolysis and AC-treatment versus AC-treatment alone in PE are being assessed in ongoing studies.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During the last 10 years anticoagulant (AC) therapy and thrombolytic treatment of venous thromboembolism (VT) have been evaluated in randomized studies. Adjusted subcutaneous (s.c.) heparin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are found at least as effective as intravenous (i.v.) infusion of heparin in deep venous thrombosis (DVT) without an increased bleeding risk. In pulmonary embolism (PE) randomized trials assessing the efficacy of s.c. heparin and LMWH are missing. Oral AC-treatment can be initiated from the first or second day in VT. The recommended duration is three months for medical patients, and 4 weeks seem appropriate for surgical patients that are completely mobilized and without persisting predisposing factors. Long-term efficacy of thrombolytic treatment of DVT has only been assessed in small trials showing a trend towards reduced risk of developing chronic venous insufficiency. Short-term thrombolytic treatment of DVT is evaluated in ongoing trials. In the treatment of PE short-term thrombolysis with either t-PA or urokinase is found to be as effective as long-term thrombolytic treatment with a reduced bleeding risk. Thrombolytic therapy rapidly reduces embolic mass and stabilizes haemodynamics, but mortality and long-term efficacy of thrombolysis and AC-treatment versus AC-treatment alone in PE are being assessed in ongoing studies.

Key concepts: Medicine, Pulmonary embolism, Thrombolysis, Urokinase, Heparin, Venous thrombosis, Thrombosis, Randomized controlled trial

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapy in deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens