1989PubMedRequires access

[Oral rehydration therapy in acute diarrheal syndrome. A critical analysis of various aspects].

G Duffau-Toro

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The use of the "universal" glucoelectrolytic solution proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the treatment of the acute diarrheal syndrome, has now been recognized worldwide and successfully employed in the treatment of diarrhea and the maintenance of the normohydrated state once the patient has recuperated. All in all, it is necessary to comment and distinguish its beneficial aspects once placed into practice. This article primarily focuses on: 1. The recognition that local health indicators will determine importantly, the evaluation of the results obtained from the use of oral rehydration therapy; 2. The establishment of sound elements of judgement for the evaluation of the rehydrating solution from its composition to the volume employed; 3. Comment on the contraindications of oral rehydration therapy and describe the treatment plan suggested by the WHO; 4. Explain why in some parts of the world a sodium concentration of 60 is preferred over the 90 mmol/L found in the rehydrating solution; 5. Point out the risk of producing hypernatremia in patients rehydrated with the WHO solution and mechanisms which tend to reduce it; and finally, establish individualized management of water and electrolytic disturbances for certain regions of the world according to their health characteristics. Acute diarrhea; oral rehydration; critique.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The use of the "universal" glucoelectrolytic solution proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the treatment of the acute diarrheal syndrome, has now been recognized worldwide and successfully employed in the treatment of diarrhea and the maintenance of the normohydrated state once the patient has recuperated. All in all, it is necessary to comment and distinguish its beneficial aspects once placed into practice. This article primarily focuses on: 1. The recognition that local health indicators will determine importantly, the evaluation of the results obtained from the use of oral rehydration therapy; 2. The establishment of sound elements of judgement for the evaluation of the rehydrating solution from its composition to the volume employed; 3. Comment on the contraindications of oral rehydration therapy and describe the treatment plan suggested by the WHO; 4. Explain why in some parts of the world a sodium concentration of 60 is preferred over the 90 mmol/L found in the rehydrating solution; 5. Point out the risk of producing hypernatremia in patients rehydrated with the WHO solution and mechanisms which tend to reduce it; and finally, establish individualized management of water and electrolytic disturbances for certain regions of the world according to their health characteristics. Acute diarrhea; oral rehydration; critique.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The use of the "universal" glucoelectrolytic solution proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the treatment of the acute diarrheal syndrome, has now been recognized worldwide and successfully employed in the treatment of diarrhea and the maintenance of the normohydrated state once the patient has recuperated. All in all, it is necessary to comment and distinguish its beneficial aspects once placed into practice. This article primarily focuses on: 1. The recognition that local health indicators will determine importantly, the evaluation of the results obtained from the use of oral rehydration therapy; 2. The establishment of sound elements of judgement for the evaluation of the rehydrating solution from its composition to the volume employed; 3. Comment on the contraindications of oral rehydration therapy and describe the treatment plan suggested by the WHO; 4. Explain why in some parts of the world a sodium concentration of 60 is preferred over the 90 mmol/L found in the rehydrating solution; 5. Point out the risk of producing hypernatremia in patients rehydrated with the WHO solution and mechanisms which tend to reduce it; and finally, establish individualized management of water and electrolytic disturbances for certain regions of the world according to their health characteristics. Acute diarrhea; oral rehydration; critique.

Key concepts: Oral rehydration therapy, Diarrhea, Intensive care medicine, Hypernatremia, Medicine, Acute diarrhea, Diarrheal diseases, Oral health

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Oral rehydration therapy in acute diarrheal syndrome. A critical analysis of various aspects]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens