1993•PubMedRequires access

[Intraepithelial cervical lesions: colpo-microcolposcopic diagnosis].

S Pace, G L Labi, M Figliolini, Patrizia Stentella, Viviana Falco, M Mastrone, Claudio Villani, Giovanni Lotti

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Integration of colposcopy and microcolposcopy allows to perform a complete study of eso- endo-cervix, for a diagnostic and topographic evaluation of cervical intraepithelial lesion. We have endoscopically studied 172 patients with histologically demonstrated CIN. In 218 cases (74.4%) the microcolposcopical evaluation corresponded to the histological diagnosis. These data confirm the methodological effectiveness of microcolposcopy and recommend it as helpful mean for cervical pathology investigation. However we believe that histological evaluation is necessary for a correct staging of the lesion. According to our experience indications for microcolposcopy are: 1) identification of endocervical lesion and squamo-columnar junction, when colposcopically not evident; 2) possibility of performing a "tailored" conization; 3) study of endocervix after conization.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Integration of colposcopy and microcolposcopy allows to perform a complete study of eso- endo-cervix, for a diagnostic and topographic evaluation of cervical intraepithelial lesion. We have endoscopically studied 172 patients with histologically demonstrated CIN. In 218 cases (74.4%) the microcolposcopical evaluation corresponded to the histological diagnosis. These data confirm the methodological effectiveness of microcolposcopy and recommend it as helpful mean for cervical pathology investigation. However we believe that histological evaluation is necessary for a correct staging of the lesion. According to our experience indications for microcolposcopy are: 1) identification of endocervical lesion and squamo-columnar junction, when colposcopically not evident; 2) possibility of performing a "tailored" conization; 3) study of endocervix after conization.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Integration of colposcopy and microcolposcopy allows to perform a complete study of eso- endo-cervix, for a diagnostic and topographic evaluation of cervical intraepithelial lesion. We have endoscopically studied 172 patients with histologically demonstrated CIN. In 218 cases (74.4%) the microcolposcopical evaluation corresponded to the histological diagnosis. These data confirm the methodological effectiveness of microcolposcopy and recommend it as helpful mean for cervical pathology investigation. However we believe that histological evaluation is necessary for a correct staging of the lesion. According to our experience indications for microcolposcopy are: 1) identification of endocervical lesion and squamo-columnar junction, when colposcopically not evident; 2) possibility of performing a "tailored" conization; 3) study of endocervix after conization.

Key concepts: Medicine, Colposcopy, Endocervix, Lesion, Cervix, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Squamous intraepithelial lesion, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Intraepithelial cervical lesions: colpo-microcolposcopic diagnosis]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens