2014Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)Open access

Eye can't ignore what you're saying: Varying the reliability of gaze and language.

R. Macdonald, Benjamin W. Tatler

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Gaze cues quickly orient attention, but language can affect the extent to which we follow these cues (Macdonald & Tatler, 2013).We investigated how reliability of language and gaze cues affect attention.Participants, provided with gaze and verbal cues, selected one of two potential targets and received immediate feedback.Different combinations of gaze and language reliabilities (50%, 80%, 100%) were used across nine sessions.The most reliable cue available informed participants' decisions.Language was favoured when reliability was equal and cues incongruent.When language cues were 100% reliable, incongruent gaze cues had a larger detrimental effect on performance when they were 80% reliable compared to 50%.When gaze cues were 100% reliable, there was an overall detrimental effect of unreliable language, with performance slower when language was 50% reliable compared to 80%.We conclude that language cues are favoured and cause disruption when unreliable, even when superfluous to the task.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Gaze cues quickly orient attention, but language can affect the extent to which we follow these cues (Macdonald & Tatler, 2013).We investigated how reliability of language and gaze cues affect attention.Participants, provided with gaze and verbal cues, selected one of two potential targets and received immediate feedback.Different combinations of gaze and language reliabilities (50%, 80%, 100%) were used across nine sessions.The most reliable cue available informed participants' decisions.Language was favoured when reliability was equal and cues incongruent.When language cues were 100% reliable, incongruent gaze cues had a larger detrimental effect on performance when they were 80% reliable compared to 50%.When gaze cues were 100% reliable, there was an overall detrimental effect of unreliable language, with performance slower when language was 50% reliable compared to 80%.We conclude that language cues are favoured and cause disruption when unreliable, even when superfluous to the task.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Gaze cues quickly orient attention, but language can affect the extent to which we follow these cues (Macdonald & Tatler, 2013).We investigated how reliability of language and gaze cues affect attention.Participants, provided with gaze and verbal cues, selected one of two potential targets and received immediate feedback.Different combinations of gaze and language reliabilities (50%, 80%, 100%) were used across nine sessions.The most reliable cue available informed participants' decisions.Language was favoured when reliability was equal and cues incongruent.When language cues were 100% reliable, incongruent gaze cues had a larger detrimental effect on performance when they were 80% reliable compared to 50%.When gaze cues were 100% reliable, there was an overall detrimental effect of unreliable language, with performance slower when language was 50% reliable compared to 80%.We conclude that language cues are favoured and cause disruption when unreliable, even when superfluous to the task.

Key concepts: Gaze, Psychology, Cognitive psychology, Task (project management), Eye movement, Reflexivity, Reliability (semiconductor), Eye tracking

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Eye can't ignore what you're saying: Varying the reliability of gaze and language. — Research Paper | ScholarLens