Pesticides and Health: A Review of Evidence on Health Effects, Valuation of Risks, and Benefit-Cost Analysis
Damián Tago, Henrik Andersson, Nicolas Treich
Abstract
Damián Tago, Henrik Andersson, Nicolas Treich
Abstract
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This study presents literature reviews for the period 2000-2013 on (i) the health effects of pesticides and on (ii) preference valuation of health risks related to pesticides, as well as a discussion of the role of benefit-cost analysis applied to pesticide regulatory measures. FINDINGS: This study indicates that the health literature has focused on individuals with direct exposure to pesticides, i.e. farmers, while the literature on preference valuation has focused on those with indirect exposure, i.e. consumers. The discussion highlights the need to clarify the rationale for regulating pesticides, the role of risk perceptions in benefit-cost analysis, and the importance of inter-disciplinary research in this area. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study relates findings of different disciplines (health, economics, public policy) regarding pesticides, and identifies gaps for future research.
OpenAlex reports 104 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This study presents literature reviews for the period 2000-2013 on (i) the health effects of pesticides and on (ii) preference valuation of health risks related to pesticides, as well as a discussion of the role of benefit-cost analysis applied to pesticide regulatory measures. FINDINGS: This study indicates that the health literature has focused on individuals with direct exposure to pesticides, i.e. farmers, while the literature on preference valuation has focused on those with indirect exposure, i.e. consumers. The discussion highlights the need to clarify the rationale for regulating pesticides, the role of risk perceptions in benefit-cost analysis, and the importance of inter-disciplinary research in this area. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study relates findings of different disciplines (health, economics, public policy) regarding pesticides, and identifies gaps for future research.
Key concepts: Valuation (finance), Pesticide, Public economics, Business, Cost–benefit analysis, Environmental health, Public health, Discipline