1986Acta Clinica BelgicaRequires access

A One Year Survey on the Epidemiology of Aminoglycoside Resistance in a General Hospital: Influence of Amikacin.

R. Vanhoorf, Jelena Hubrechts, E. Roebben, Mathias Claeys, Eric Nulens, H.-J. Nyssen, M. Van Haeverbeek, J.-P. Van Gysel

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

SummaryIn a 15 month period we have studied the epidemiology of aminoglycoside resistance in ai general hospital. We determined the effect of preferential amikacin usage on the resistance levels of amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin and dibekacin. The resistance levels’ to each of these antibiotics were monitored in a> 3 month baseline phase during which amikacin usage was less than 1 %. During the remainder 12 months, amikacin was the aminoglycoside of choice and in this period no significant change in aminoglycoside resistance was noted. Nevertheless some changes in the combined resistance were found. From the aminoglycoside resistant strains only 8.8 % showed resistance to amikacin. Isolated amikacin resistance was not found and amikacin resistant strains showed cross-resistance to nearly all the other aminoglycosides.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SummaryIn a 15 month period we have studied the epidemiology of aminoglycoside resistance in ai general hospital. We determined the effect of preferential amikacin usage on the resistance levels of amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin and dibekacin. The resistance levels’ to each of these antibiotics were monitored in a> 3 month baseline phase during which amikacin usage was less than 1 %. During the remainder 12 months, amikacin was the aminoglycoside of choice and in this period no significant change in aminoglycoside resistance was noted. Nevertheless some changes in the combined resistance were found. From the aminoglycoside resistant strains only 8.8 % showed resistance to amikacin. Isolated amikacin resistance was not found and amikacin resistant strains showed cross-resistance to nearly all the other aminoglycosides.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SummaryIn a 15 month period we have studied the epidemiology of aminoglycoside resistance in ai general hospital. We determined the effect of preferential amikacin usage on the resistance levels of amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin and dibekacin. The resistance levels’ to each of these antibiotics were monitored in a> 3 month baseline phase during which amikacin usage was less than 1 %. During the remainder 12 months, amikacin was the aminoglycoside of choice and in this period no significant change in aminoglycoside resistance was noted. Nevertheless some changes in the combined resistance were found. From the aminoglycoside resistant strains only 8.8 % showed resistance to amikacin. Isolated amikacin resistance was not found and amikacin resistant strains showed cross-resistance to nearly all the other aminoglycosides.

Key concepts: Amikacin, Netilmicin, Aminoglycoside, Tobramycin, Medicine, Gentamicin, Antibiotics, Microbiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A One Year Survey on the Epidemiology of Aminoglycoside Resistance in a General Hospital: Influence of Amikacin. — Research Paper | ScholarLens