1983•PubMedRequires access

Horizontal cross-sections of the cervical spine. Computed tomography and anatomy every 6 mm.

Patrice Pierre Le Floch-Prigent

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Comparison between the anatomical and computed tomographical aspects, was performed on horizontal cross-sections every 6 mm, of one human cervical spine. The entire spine was taken off from a fresh man's cadaver with the head and neck. The sample was first computed tomographied and then anatomically sawn on the same levels with the same thickness. The differences between both techniques are minimal, dued to the analysis of a plane for the anatomy and the integration of a volume for the C.T. scan. Clinical and fundamental applications are pointed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Comparison between the anatomical and computed tomographical aspects, was performed on horizontal cross-sections every 6 mm, of one human cervical spine. The entire spine was taken off from a fresh man's cadaver with the head and neck. The sample was first computed tomographied and then anatomically sawn on the same levels with the same thickness. The differences between both techniques are minimal, dued to the analysis of a plane for the anatomy and the integration of a volume for the C.T. scan. Clinical and fundamental applications are pointed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Comparison between the anatomical and computed tomographical aspects, was performed on horizontal cross-sections every 6 mm, of one human cervical spine. The entire spine was taken off from a fresh man's cadaver with the head and neck. The sample was first computed tomographied and then anatomically sawn on the same levels with the same thickness. The differences between both techniques are minimal, dued to the analysis of a plane for the anatomy and the integration of a volume for the C.T. scan. Clinical and fundamental applications are pointed.

Key concepts: Anatomy, Computed tomography, Cadaver, Cervical spine, Medicine, Cervical vertebrae, Head and neck, Nuclear medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Horizontal cross-sections of the cervical spine. Computed tomography and anatomy every 6 mm. — Research Paper | ScholarLens