2008PubMedRequires access

[Construction of the gene drb0099 deleted mutant and adversity analysis in the extremely radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans].

Chang Shenghe, Haiyan Shu, Huiming Lu, Yuejin Hua, Zongwei Li, Shuangqi Tian, Yanping Wang, Linhai Chen, Zhongfang Tan, Guangyong Qin

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Deinococcus radiodurans R1 has extraordinary resistance to radiation. DRB0099 might play an important role in protecting the bacterium against radiation. To verify the inference, we deleted drb0099 and constructed the mutant. Comparing with the wild type, the mutant grew more slowly in the beginning cultivation stage (0-16 h) under normal conditions. After being cultivated for 16 h, the mutant grew faster than the wild type. The biomass concentration of the wild type was always higher than that of the mutant. The mutant cell's fission during the growing phase might be blocked. When treated with UV, although Deinococcus radiodurans R1 cultures' survival fraction was lower with UV treatment time increased, the survival fraction was much higher than that of drb0099. The wild type could repair DNA double strands breaks better than the mutant. The gene drb0099 might directly relate with the DNA repair system. The mutant was more sensitive to H202 than the wild type. The wild type could better protect protein and DNA against reactive oxygen species (ROS) or in DNA repair. When treated with low concentration of H2O2, although the survival fraction of both R1 and the mutant decreased, the difference was small. However, with the concentration of H2O2 increased, the difference value increased. The mutant without drb0099 was more easily injured than the wild type with ROS increased. Under UV or H2O2 treatment, DRB0099 could protect protein and DNA from oxidation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Deinococcus radiodurans R1 has extraordinary resistance to radiation. DRB0099 might play an important role in protecting the bacterium against radiation. To verify the inference, we deleted drb0099 and constructed the mutant. Comparing with the wild type, the mutant grew more slowly in the beginning cultivation stage (0-16 h) under normal conditions. After being cultivated for 16 h, the mutant grew faster than the wild type. The biomass concentration of the wild type was always higher than that of the mutant. The mutant cell's fission during the growing phase might be blocked. When treated with UV, although Deinococcus radiodurans R1 cultures' survival fraction was lower with UV treatment time increased, the survival fraction was much higher than that of drb0099. The wild type could repair DNA double strands breaks better than the mutant. The gene drb0099 might directly relate with the DNA repair system. The mutant was more sensitive to H202 than the wild type. The wild type could better protect protein and DNA against reactive oxygen species (ROS) or in DNA repair. When treated with low concentration of H2O2, although the survival fraction of both R1 and the mutant decreased, the difference was small. However, with the concentration of H2O2 increased, the difference value increased. The mutant without drb0099 was more easily injured than the wild type with ROS increased. Under UV or H2O2 treatment, DRB0099 could protect protein and DNA from oxidation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Deinococcus radiodurans R1 has extraordinary resistance to radiation. DRB0099 might play an important role in protecting the bacterium against radiation. To verify the inference, we deleted drb0099 and constructed the mutant. Comparing with the wild type, the mutant grew more slowly in the beginning cultivation stage (0-16 h) under normal conditions. After being cultivated for 16 h, the mutant grew faster than the wild type. The biomass concentration of the wild type was always higher than that of the mutant. The mutant cell's fission during the growing phase might be blocked. When treated with UV, although Deinococcus radiodurans R1 cultures' survival fraction was lower with UV treatment time increased, the survival fraction was much higher than that of drb0099. The wild type could repair DNA double strands breaks better than the mutant. The gene drb0099 might directly relate with the DNA repair system. The mutant was more sensitive to H202 than the wild type. The wild type could better protect protein and DNA against reactive oxygen species (ROS) or in DNA repair. When treated with low concentration of H2O2, although the survival fraction of both R1 and the mutant decreased, the difference was small. However, with the concentration of H2O2 increased, the difference value increased. The mutant without drb0099 was more easily injured than the wild type with ROS increased. Under UV or H2O2 treatment, DRB0099 could protect protein and DNA from oxidation.

Key concepts: Deinococcus radiodurans, Mutant, Deinococcus, Wild type, Biology, DNA repair, DNA damage, Radioresistance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Construction of the gene drb0099 deleted mutant and adversity analysis in the extremely radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens