1975PubMedRequires access

[Results with automatic refraction (author's transl)].

Henrik Holtmann, P. Kroll

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Hundred eyes of young patients with an average age of 25 years were measured with two refraction methods: 1. subjectiv refraction and 2. automatic refraction with the "Dioptron". The results of refraction and visual acuity before and after cycloplegia were compared. As for the spherical aquivalents we found a very good correlation between both methods (r - 0,98). The "Dioptron" printed out stronger cylindric powers as were found with the subjectiv refraction. Furthermore it could be shown that the stronger the cylindric power the smaller the axial deviation between subjectiv and automatic refraction. We believe that the automatic refraction with "Dioptron" is a good screening method, which cannot replace fine subjective adjustments, but complements them by serving as a good starting point for the refractive procedure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Hundred eyes of young patients with an average age of 25 years were measured with two refraction methods: 1. subjectiv refraction and 2. automatic refraction with the "Dioptron". The results of refraction and visual acuity before and after cycloplegia were compared. As for the spherical aquivalents we found a very good correlation between both methods (r - 0,98). The "Dioptron" printed out stronger cylindric powers as were found with the subjectiv refraction. Furthermore it could be shown that the stronger the cylindric power the smaller the axial deviation between subjectiv and automatic refraction. We believe that the automatic refraction with "Dioptron" is a good screening method, which cannot replace fine subjective adjustments, but complements them by serving as a good starting point for the refractive procedure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Hundred eyes of young patients with an average age of 25 years were measured with two refraction methods: 1. subjectiv refraction and 2. automatic refraction with the "Dioptron". The results of refraction and visual acuity before and after cycloplegia were compared. As for the spherical aquivalents we found a very good correlation between both methods (r - 0,98). The "Dioptron" printed out stronger cylindric powers as were found with the subjectiv refraction. Furthermore it could be shown that the stronger the cylindric power the smaller the axial deviation between subjectiv and automatic refraction. We believe that the automatic refraction with "Dioptron" is a good screening method, which cannot replace fine subjective adjustments, but complements them by serving as a good starting point for the refractive procedure.

Key concepts: Cycloplegia, Refraction, Optics, Subjective refraction, Optical power, Optometry, Visual acuity, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Results with automatic refraction (author's transl)]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens