2008Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck SurgeryRequires access

Delayed Reduction of Pure Medial Blowout Fracture of the Orbital Wall

Hong Jin, Woo-Sub Shim, Si-Ok Shin, Young-Seok Choi, Young Eun Moon, Seung-Du Yoo, Ji-Chul Choi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives:The timing of surgery is an important consideration point in the management of blowout fracture (BOF) of the orbit. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcome of early and delayed reduction and to suggest the best timing of surgery in the pure medial BOF of the orbit. Subjects and Method:Fifty-two patients who had endoscopic endonasal reduction of medial BOF were studied retrospectively. Patients were divided into an early group (N=42) who had surgery within one month after the trauma and a delayed group (N=10) who had surgery after one month from the trauma. Surgical indications, results of the surgery, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results:The surgical indications in the early group were persistent diplopia, large defect expecting later enophthalmos and limitation of EOM, whereas the delayed group complained mainly of enophthalmos and diplopia. There were no significant differences in surgical outcomes and the rate of complications between the two groups. Conclusion:When patients with pure medial BOF have large defects without any persistent diplopia and limitation of EOM, surgery would be safely deferred until significant enophthalmos occurs. (Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2008;51:796-9)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background and Objectives:The timing of surgery is an important consideration point in the management of blowout fracture (BOF) of the orbit. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcome of early and delayed reduction and to suggest the best timing of surgery in the pure medial BOF of the orbit. Subjects and Method:Fifty-two patients who had endoscopic endonasal reduction of medial BOF were studied retrospectively. Patients were divided into an early group (N=42) who had surgery within one month after the trauma and a delayed group (N=10) who had surgery after one month from the trauma. Surgical indications, results of the surgery, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results:The surgical indications in the early group were persistent diplopia, large defect expecting later enophthalmos and limitation of EOM, whereas the delayed group complained mainly of enophthalmos and diplopia. There were no significant differences in surgical outcomes and the rate of complications between the two groups. Conclusion:When patients with pure medial BOF have large defects without any persistent diplopia and limitation of EOM, surgery would be safely deferred until significant enophthalmos occurs. (Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2008;51:796-9)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background and Objectives:The timing of surgery is an important consideration point in the management of blowout fracture (BOF) of the orbit. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcome of early and delayed reduction and to suggest the best timing of surgery in the pure medial BOF of the orbit. Subjects and Method:Fifty-two patients who had endoscopic endonasal reduction of medial BOF were studied retrospectively. Patients were divided into an early group (N=42) who had surgery within one month after the trauma and a delayed group (N=10) who had surgery after one month from the trauma. Surgical indications, results of the surgery, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results:The surgical indications in the early group were persistent diplopia, large defect expecting later enophthalmos and limitation of EOM, whereas the delayed group complained mainly of enophthalmos and diplopia. There were no significant differences in surgical outcomes and the rate of complications between the two groups. Conclusion:When patients with pure medial BOF have large defects without any persistent diplopia and limitation of EOM, surgery would be safely deferred until significant enophthalmos occurs. (Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2008;51:796-9)

Key concepts: Enophthalmos, Diplopia, Medicine, Surgery, Reduction (mathematics), Orbit (dynamics), Engineering, Geometry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Delayed Reduction of Pure Medial Blowout Fracture of the Orbital Wall — Research Paper | ScholarLens