A Double Blind Comparison of Alfentanil and Fentanyl
H. Liberman, David Andrew Pybus, T. A. Torda
Abstract
Open-access reader
H. Liberman, David Andrew Pybus, T. A. Torda
Abstract
Open-access reader
Alfentanil and fentanyl were compared as supplements to thiopentone, nitrous oxide, relaxant anaesthesia in a randomised, double blind trial carried out on 55 adult patients undergoing elective surgery. The fentanyl-treated patients resumed spontaneous ventilation more rapidly at the end of anaesthesia (3 minutes) than the alfentanil-treated group (5.1 minutes, p less than 0.02). In other respects the drugs appeared indistinguishable. A computer model is used to explain why, despite the shorter elimination half-life, the alfentanil-treated patients did not awaken more rapidly than those in the fentanyl group.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Alfentanil and fentanyl were compared as supplements to thiopentone, nitrous oxide, relaxant anaesthesia in a randomised, double blind trial carried out on 55 adult patients undergoing elective surgery. The fentanyl-treated patients resumed spontaneous ventilation more rapidly at the end of anaesthesia (3 minutes) than the alfentanil-treated group (5.1 minutes, p less than 0.02). In other respects the drugs appeared indistinguishable. A computer model is used to explain why, despite the shorter elimination half-life, the alfentanil-treated patients did not awaken more rapidly than those in the fentanyl group.
Key concepts: Alfentanil, Medicine, Fentanyl, Anesthesia, Nitrous oxide, Double blind, Surgery, Placebo