1979•Unpublished venueOpen access

Costs of coal and electric power production: the impact of environmental control technologies for coal-cleaning plants. [Includes both coal cleaning and flue gas desulfurization costs]

Edward F. Thode, J Williams, Eugene M. Wewerka, Paul M. Wagner

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Costs of 10 alternative environmental control technologies were calculated for three hypothetical and three actual cleaning plants. The cost of lime-limestone slurry coating ranged from $0.22 to $0.50 per ton of product coal. For one actual plant cleaning high-sulfur coal, the range of costs for the 10 alternatives was from $0.076 to $9.89 per ton of product coal, based on March 1978 costs. For the purpose of supplying electric utility customers, coal cleaning reduces the cost of meeting environmental standards because it is less expensive (potentially) to control the water pollution from the coal-cleaning plant than the air pollution from the utility power plant. Applying the less expensive environmental control technology options to coal-cleaning wastes adds approximately 0.2 to 0.4 mills/kWh to the costs of electric power production (1979 costs).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Costs of 10 alternative environmental control technologies were calculated for three hypothetical and three actual cleaning plants. The cost of lime-limestone slurry coating ranged from $0.22 to $0.50 per ton of product coal. For one actual plant cleaning high-sulfur coal, the range of costs for the 10 alternatives was from $0.076 to $9.89 per ton of product coal, based on March 1978 costs. For the purpose of supplying electric utility customers, coal cleaning reduces the cost of meeting environmental standards because it is less expensive (potentially) to control the water pollution from the coal-cleaning plant than the air pollution from the utility power plant. Applying the less expensive environmental control technology options to coal-cleaning wastes adds approximately 0.2 to 0.4 mills/kWh to the costs of electric power production (1979 costs).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Costs of 10 alternative environmental control technologies were calculated for three hypothetical and three actual cleaning plants. The cost of lime-limestone slurry coating ranged from $0.22 to $0.50 per ton of product coal. For one actual plant cleaning high-sulfur coal, the range of costs for the 10 alternatives was from $0.076 to $9.89 per ton of product coal, based on March 1978 costs. For the purpose of supplying electric utility customers, coal cleaning reduces the cost of meeting environmental standards because it is less expensive (potentially) to control the water pollution from the coal-cleaning plant than the air pollution from the utility power plant. Applying the less expensive environmental control technology options to coal-cleaning wastes adds approximately 0.2 to 0.4 mills/kWh to the costs of electric power production (1979 costs).

Key concepts: Coal, Waste management, Slurry, Flue-gas desulfurization, Clean coal technology, Clean coal, Environmental science, Power station

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Costs of coal and electric power production: the impact of environmental control technologies for coal-cleaning plants. [Includes both coal cleaning and flue gas desulfurization costs] — Research Paper | ScholarLens