1989PubMedRequires access

[Peptic ulcer with a visible non-bleeding vascular wall--early elective surgery or endoscopic therapy?].

P. Sandbichler, Heinz Pernthaler, Dietmar Öfner, Alfred Königsrainer, Gerhard P. Schwab, Felix Aigner

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The records of 71 patients with the endoscopic finding of a peptic ulcer with a non-bleeding visible vessel, treated between 1982 and 1987 were retrospectively analysed. 16 patients underwent early surgical treatment (group I), 15 patients were treated conservatively (group II) and 40 patients by endoscopic haemostasis (group III). Recurrent bleeding was observed in 6.25% patients in group I, in 53.3% in group II and in 25% in group III, in which case endoscopy was performed again. The patients with arterial bleeding underwent early elective operation after endoscopic haemostasis. Deaths occurred only in the postoperative period: group I 6.25%, group II 13%, and group III 5%. These findings indicate that primary endoscopic treatment in selected patients leads to results equal to those achieved with early surgery. Conservative therapy cannot, however, be recommended.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The records of 71 patients with the endoscopic finding of a peptic ulcer with a non-bleeding visible vessel, treated between 1982 and 1987 were retrospectively analysed. 16 patients underwent early surgical treatment (group I), 15 patients were treated conservatively (group II) and 40 patients by endoscopic haemostasis (group III). Recurrent bleeding was observed in 6.25% patients in group I, in 53.3% in group II and in 25% in group III, in which case endoscopy was performed again. The patients with arterial bleeding underwent early elective operation after endoscopic haemostasis. Deaths occurred only in the postoperative period: group I 6.25%, group II 13%, and group III 5%. These findings indicate that primary endoscopic treatment in selected patients leads to results equal to those achieved with early surgery. Conservative therapy cannot, however, be recommended.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The records of 71 patients with the endoscopic finding of a peptic ulcer with a non-bleeding visible vessel, treated between 1982 and 1987 were retrospectively analysed. 16 patients underwent early surgical treatment (group I), 15 patients were treated conservatively (group II) and 40 patients by endoscopic haemostasis (group III). Recurrent bleeding was observed in 6.25% patients in group I, in 53.3% in group II and in 25% in group III, in which case endoscopy was performed again. The patients with arterial bleeding underwent early elective operation after endoscopic haemostasis. Deaths occurred only in the postoperative period: group I 6.25%, group II 13%, and group III 5%. These findings indicate that primary endoscopic treatment in selected patients leads to results equal to those achieved with early surgery. Conservative therapy cannot, however, be recommended.

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Endoscopy, Peptic ulcer, Endoscopic treatment, Peptic, Elective surgery, Conservative treatment

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Peptic ulcer with a visible non-bleeding vascular wall--early elective surgery or endoscopic therapy?]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens