2016Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese)Open access

Seismic response and its analysis for components of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plants in 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake

Kazuyuki Nagasawa, Tadashi NARABAYASHI

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The Fukushima Daiichi (1F) accident in unit 1 to 4 was likely to be caused by the tsunami induced loss of emergency power and seawater heat sink that is consistently elucidated based on the performance of the plants until the tsunami hit after the seismic SCRAM by Great East Japan Earthquake. However it is fact that the actual damages of components have difficulty to be completely inspected under high radioactivity, and to make clear distinction between tsunami induced damage and seismic induced damage. This paper will support above conclusion based on the result of seismic response analysis for safety related components of each plant, the result of the plant walk down in the similar unit in the same station, and also the result of analysis for the observed seismic records from the perspective of generalization of the damage possibility of nuclear components designed by Japanese seismic standards. The result of seismic response analysis using observed seismic motion shows all safety related components fulfill the seismic criteria and seem to maintain structural integrity. Also we could find few seismic induced damage in the walk down for unit 5 of 1F that shows similar result would be expected in unit 1 to 4. It is concluded that the design method using seismic static load contributes additional robustness of nuclear components, even the lower seismic class components, and that the damage by the earthquake should be quite limited based on the analysis of observed seismic motions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Fukushima Daiichi (1F) accident in unit 1 to 4 was likely to be caused by the tsunami induced loss of emergency power and seawater heat sink that is consistently elucidated based on the performance of the plants until the tsunami hit after the seismic SCRAM by Great East Japan Earthquake. However it is fact that the actual damages of components have difficulty to be completely inspected under high radioactivity, and to make clear distinction between tsunami induced damage and seismic induced damage. This paper will support above conclusion based on the result of seismic response analysis for safety related components of each plant, the result of the plant walk down in the similar unit in the same station, and also the result of analysis for the observed seismic records from the perspective of generalization of the damage possibility of nuclear components designed by Japanese seismic standards. The result of seismic response analysis using observed seismic motion shows all safety related components fulfill the seismic criteria and seem to maintain structural integrity. Also we could find few seismic induced damage in the walk down for unit 5 of 1F that shows similar result would be expected in unit 1 to 4. It is concluded that the design method using seismic static load contributes additional robustness of nuclear components, even the lower seismic class components, and that the damage by the earthquake should be quite limited based on the analysis of observed seismic motions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Fukushima Daiichi (1F) accident in unit 1 to 4 was likely to be caused by the tsunami induced loss of emergency power and seawater heat sink that is consistently elucidated based on the performance of the plants until the tsunami hit after the seismic SCRAM by Great East Japan Earthquake. However it is fact that the actual damages of components have difficulty to be completely inspected under high radioactivity, and to make clear distinction between tsunami induced damage and seismic induced damage. This paper will support above conclusion based on the result of seismic response analysis for safety related components of each plant, the result of the plant walk down in the similar unit in the same station, and also the result of analysis for the observed seismic records from the perspective of generalization of the damage possibility of nuclear components designed by Japanese seismic standards. The result of seismic response analysis using observed seismic motion shows all safety related components fulfill the seismic criteria and seem to maintain structural integrity. Also we could find few seismic induced damage in the walk down for unit 5 of 1F that shows similar result would be expected in unit 1 to 4. It is concluded that the design method using seismic static load contributes additional robustness of nuclear components, even the lower seismic class components, and that the damage by the earthquake should be quite limited based on the analysis of observed seismic motions.

Key concepts: Nuclear power plant, Seismology, Seismic analysis, Geology, Earthquake simulation, Earthquake scenario, Forensic engineering, Seismic hazard

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Seismic response and its analysis for components of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plants in 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake — Research Paper | ScholarLens