Towards a perceptual model of speech rhythm: integrating the influence of f0 on perceived duration
Robert Fuchs
Abstract
Robert Fuchs
Abstract
Previous accounts of speech rhythm focus mainly on duration. For example, the normalised Pairwise Variability Index for vocalic intervals (nPVI-V) quantifies relative duration differences between successive vocalic intervals. Prototypical syllabletiming is characterised by small differences in duration, prototypical stress-timing by large differences. However, differences in f0 between vocalic intervals are thought to influence the perception of duration. This paper (1) quantifies the influence of differences in f0 on perceived duration in a perception experiment, and (2) suggests a modified PVI (nPVI-V(dur*f0)) that takes account of this influence. The new nPVI-V(dur*f0) is then applied to a speech corpus of (stress-timed) British English and (syllable-timed) Indian English. The results are compared to the application of the old nPVI-V, which takes into account duration only, to the same data set.
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Previous accounts of speech rhythm focus mainly on duration. For example, the normalised Pairwise Variability Index for vocalic intervals (nPVI-V) quantifies relative duration differences between successive vocalic intervals. Prototypical syllabletiming is characterised by small differences in duration, prototypical stress-timing by large differences. However, differences in f0 between vocalic intervals are thought to influence the perception of duration. This paper (1) quantifies the influence of differences in f0 on perceived duration in a perception experiment, and (2) suggests a modified PVI (nPVI-V(dur*f0)) that takes account of this influence. The new nPVI-V(dur*f0) is then applied to a speech corpus of (stress-timed) British English and (syllable-timed) Indian English. The results are compared to the application of the old nPVI-V, which takes into account duration only, to the same data set.
Key concepts: Duration (music), Perception, Rhythm, Computer science, Speech recognition, Psychology, Acoustics, Neuroscience