Efficacy and tolerance of nisoldipine VS propranolol in patients with essential hypertension.
Tomasz Chamiec, Bronisław Bednarz, Andrzej Budaj, Jan Kłos, H Pietrzykowska, Teresa Zaleska, Leszek Ceremuzyński
Abstract
Tomasz Chamiec, Bronisław Bednarz, Andrzej Budaj, Jan Kłos, H Pietrzykowska, Teresa Zaleska, Leszek Ceremuzyński
Abstract
Fifty patients with essential hypertension grade I/II. (WHO) were treated with Nisoldipine (BAY K 5552) or Propranolol for 12 weeks in a single blind, randomised trial. Both drugs similarly reduced mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Side effects were rare and usually mild. We conclude that Nisoldipine is safe and effective in the treatment of mild essential hypertension.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Fifty patients with essential hypertension grade I/II. (WHO) were treated with Nisoldipine (BAY K 5552) or Propranolol for 12 weeks in a single blind, randomised trial. Both drugs similarly reduced mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Side effects were rare and usually mild. We conclude that Nisoldipine is safe and effective in the treatment of mild essential hypertension.
Key concepts: Nisoldipine, Essential hypertension, Propranolol, Medicine, Blood pressure, Diastole, Cardiology, Internal medicine