2001PubMedRequires access

Rectal administration of misoprostol for the management of retained placenta--a preliminary report.

Y T Li, Ching Yin, F M Chen

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retained placenta is one of the serious complications of childbirth, and misoprostol is known to be a potent uterotonic agent. Therefore, we proposed that rectal misoprostol also may facilitate placental separation in women with retained placenta by its ability to increase uterine contractility. METHODS: The placenta was diagnosed as retained if it was not expelled within 40 minutes after vaginal birth. Then, 800 microg of misoprostol was inserted rectally and the patient observed thereafter. RESULTS: A total of 18 parturients who had retention of the placenta were studied; all the placentas were spontaneously expelled within 35 minutes. The side effects involved included nausea 17%, vomiting 11%, diarrhea 22%, shivering 33%, and pelvic cramping pain 44%. All these discomforts resolved within 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that misoprostol per rectum is a safe and effective technique and may be a useful alternative to manual removal of retained placentas.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Retained placenta is one of the serious complications of childbirth, and misoprostol is known to be a potent uterotonic agent. Therefore, we proposed that rectal misoprostol also may facilitate placental separation in women with retained placenta by its ability to increase uterine contractility. METHODS: The placenta was diagnosed as retained if it was not expelled within 40 minutes after vaginal birth. Then, 800 microg of misoprostol was inserted rectally and the patient observed thereafter. RESULTS: A total of 18 parturients who had retention of the placenta were studied; all the placentas were spontaneously expelled within 35 minutes. The side effects involved included nausea 17%, vomiting 11%, diarrhea 22%, shivering 33%, and pelvic cramping pain 44%. All these discomforts resolved within 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that misoprostol per rectum is a safe and effective technique and may be a useful alternative to manual removal of retained placentas.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Retained placenta is one of the serious complications of childbirth, and misoprostol is known to be a potent uterotonic agent. Therefore, we proposed that rectal misoprostol also may facilitate placental separation in women with retained placenta by its ability to increase uterine contractility. METHODS: The placenta was diagnosed as retained if it was not expelled within 40 minutes after vaginal birth. Then, 800 microg of misoprostol was inserted rectally and the patient observed thereafter. RESULTS: A total of 18 parturients who had retention of the placenta were studied; all the placentas were spontaneously expelled within 35 minutes. The side effects involved included nausea 17%, vomiting 11%, diarrhea 22%, shivering 33%, and pelvic cramping pain 44%. All these discomforts resolved within 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that misoprostol per rectum is a safe and effective technique and may be a useful alternative to manual removal of retained placentas.

Key concepts: Misoprostol, Uterotonic, Medicine, Shivering, Retained placenta, Placenta, Vomiting, Obstetrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rectal administration of misoprostol for the management of retained placenta--a preliminary report. — Research Paper | ScholarLens