2007PubMedRequires access

Extension of GnRH agonist through the luteal phase to improve the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Mete Işıkoğlu, Kemal Özgür, Sergio Oehninger

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of continuous administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during the luteal phase in an intracytoplasmic sperm injection program. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred eighty-one women underwent a down-regulation protocol of GnRHa administered from the 21st day of the preceding cycle. Patients were randomized at initiation of stimulation by a computer-generated list. Group 1 patients (n = 90) were continuously administered GnRHa for 12 days after embryo transfer, while in group 2 patients GnRHa was stopped on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration. RESULTS: Demographic parameters, infertility etiologies, number of gonadotropin ampules used, number of mature oocytes recovered, rates of testicular sperm usage, number of embryos transferred, and cycle and transfer cancellation rates were similar in both groups. Clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates and live birth rates did not show a significant difference. CONCLUSION: Extending GnRHa treatment through the luteal phase appeared not to have a significant impact on pregnancy or implantation rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of continuous administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during the luteal phase in an intracytoplasmic sperm injection program. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred eighty-one women underwent a down-regulation protocol of GnRHa administered from the 21st day of the preceding cycle. Patients were randomized at initiation of stimulation by a computer-generated list. Group 1 patients (n = 90) were continuously administered GnRHa for 12 days after embryo transfer, while in group 2 patients GnRHa was stopped on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration. RESULTS: Demographic parameters, infertility etiologies, number of gonadotropin ampules used, number of mature oocytes recovered, rates of testicular sperm usage, number of embryos transferred, and cycle and transfer cancellation rates were similar in both groups. Clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates and live birth rates did not show a significant difference. CONCLUSION: Extending GnRHa treatment through the luteal phase appeared not to have a significant impact on pregnancy or implantation rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of continuous administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during the luteal phase in an intracytoplasmic sperm injection program. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred eighty-one women underwent a down-regulation protocol of GnRHa administered from the 21st day of the preceding cycle. Patients were randomized at initiation of stimulation by a computer-generated list. Group 1 patients (n = 90) were continuously administered GnRHa for 12 days after embryo transfer, while in group 2 patients GnRHa was stopped on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration. RESULTS: Demographic parameters, infertility etiologies, number of gonadotropin ampules used, number of mature oocytes recovered, rates of testicular sperm usage, number of embryos transferred, and cycle and transfer cancellation rates were similar in both groups. Clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates and live birth rates did not show a significant difference. CONCLUSION: Extending GnRHa treatment through the luteal phase appeared not to have a significant impact on pregnancy or implantation rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Key concepts: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Luteal phase, Human chorionic gonadotropin, Medicine, Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, Embryo transfer, Andrology, Gonadotropin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Extension of GnRH agonist through the luteal phase to improve the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. — Research Paper | ScholarLens