2006PubMedRequires access

[Usefulness of serum cystatin C for the diagnosis of impaired renal function].

Chinami Oyabu, Nobuhide Hayashi, Daisuke Sugiyama, Mitio Umezu, Masahiko Mukai, Seiji Kawano, Shunichi Kumagai

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Creatinine clearance (Ccr) is generally used as a halmark of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in clinical medicine. Recently, it has been suggested that serum cystatin C measurement in serum reflects GFR. We compared serum cystatin C, serum creatinine, and serum beta2-microgrobrin in 70 patients with renal diseases in reference to creatinine clearance. The correlation between Ccr and 1/cystatin C was higher (r = 0.830) than that between Ccr and 1/serum creatinine (r = 0.789) or 1/serum beta2-microgroburin (r = 0.732). The levels of serum cystatin C in patients with Ccr ranging from 51 to 70 ml/min were significantly higher than those in patients with Ccr ranging more than 91 ml/min. Receiver-operated characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that serum cystatin C showed the highest area under the curve among the three when Ccr = 90 ml/min was used as the cutoff point. We conclude that serum cystatin C is more useful than serum creatinine to detect early renal dysfunction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Creatinine clearance (Ccr) is generally used as a halmark of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in clinical medicine. Recently, it has been suggested that serum cystatin C measurement in serum reflects GFR. We compared serum cystatin C, serum creatinine, and serum beta2-microgrobrin in 70 patients with renal diseases in reference to creatinine clearance. The correlation between Ccr and 1/cystatin C was higher (r = 0.830) than that between Ccr and 1/serum creatinine (r = 0.789) or 1/serum beta2-microgroburin (r = 0.732). The levels of serum cystatin C in patients with Ccr ranging from 51 to 70 ml/min were significantly higher than those in patients with Ccr ranging more than 91 ml/min. Receiver-operated characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that serum cystatin C showed the highest area under the curve among the three when Ccr = 90 ml/min was used as the cutoff point. We conclude that serum cystatin C is more useful than serum creatinine to detect early renal dysfunction.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Creatinine clearance (Ccr) is generally used as a halmark of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in clinical medicine. Recently, it has been suggested that serum cystatin C measurement in serum reflects GFR. We compared serum cystatin C, serum creatinine, and serum beta2-microgrobrin in 70 patients with renal diseases in reference to creatinine clearance. The correlation between Ccr and 1/cystatin C was higher (r = 0.830) than that between Ccr and 1/serum creatinine (r = 0.789) or 1/serum beta2-microgroburin (r = 0.732). The levels of serum cystatin C in patients with Ccr ranging from 51 to 70 ml/min were significantly higher than those in patients with Ccr ranging more than 91 ml/min. Receiver-operated characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that serum cystatin C showed the highest area under the curve among the three when Ccr = 90 ml/min was used as the cutoff point. We conclude that serum cystatin C is more useful than serum creatinine to detect early renal dysfunction.

Key concepts: Renal function, Cystatin C, Creatinine, Medicine, Cystatin, Internal medicine, Urology, Receiver operating characteristic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Usefulness of serum cystatin C for the diagnosis of impaired renal function]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens