2015Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Securitisation of Migration and Far Right Populist Othering in Scandinavian Countries

Gabriella Lazaridis, Vasiliki Tsagkroni

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Almost three decades after Klaus von Beyme argued that ‘there is virtually no comparative literature on the topic’ (1988: 14) far-right parties have started drawing considerable attention from scholars. From the mid-1980s onwards, Europe has faced a new phenomenon of radicalisation, which from its first occurrence was difficult to define. Since the first appearance of contemporary far-right parties, various labels, such as ‘extreme right’ (Carter 2005; Ignazi 1996; Hainsworth 2000), ‘right-wing populism’ (Decker 2004), ‘ethno-nationalism’ (Rydgren 2005), ‘anti-immigrant’ (Fennema 1997), ‘radical right’ (Minkenberg 1998; Kitschelt and McGann 1995) and ‘far right’ (Marcus 2000) have been used to describe and classify this new political family. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Almost three decades after Klaus von Beyme argued that ‘there is virtually no comparative literature on the topic’ (1988: 14) far-right parties have started drawing considerable attention from scholars. From the mid-1980s onwards, Europe has faced a new phenomenon of radicalisation, which from its first occurrence was difficult to define. Since the first appearance of contemporary far-right parties, various labels, such as ‘extreme right’ (Carter 2005; Ignazi 1996; Hainsworth 2000), ‘right-wing populism’ (Decker 2004), ‘ethno-nationalism’ (Rydgren 2005), ‘anti-immigrant’ (Fennema 1997), ‘radical right’ (Minkenberg 1998; Kitschelt and McGann 1995) and ‘far right’ (Marcus 2000) have been used to describe and classify this new political family. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Almost three decades after Klaus von Beyme argued that ‘there is virtually no comparative literature on the topic’ (1988: 14) far-right parties have started drawing considerable attention from scholars. From the mid-1980s onwards, Europe has faced a new phenomenon of radicalisation, which from its first occurrence was difficult to define. Since the first appearance of contemporary far-right parties, various labels, such as ‘extreme right’ (Carter 2005; Ignazi 1996; Hainsworth 2000), ‘right-wing populism’ (Decker 2004), ‘ethno-nationalism’ (Rydgren 2005), ‘anti-immigrant’ (Fennema 1997), ‘radical right’ (Minkenberg 1998; Kitschelt and McGann 1995) and ‘far right’ (Marcus 2000) have been used to describe and classify this new political family. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Far right, Extreme right, Populism, Radical right, New Right, Nationalism, Politics, Immigration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Securitisation of Migration and Far Right Populist Othering in Scandinavian Countries — Research Paper | ScholarLens