2006•Orthopaedic ProceedingsRequires access

ACCURACY OF IMAGE GUIDED PERCUTANEOUS NEEDLE BIOPSY COMPARED TO PERCUTANEOUS NEEDLE BIOPSY WITHOUT IMAGE GUIDANCE IN DIAGNOSIS OF SOFT TISSUE TUMOURS.

Amir Ali Narvani, Eleftherios E. Tsiridis, Ruth L. Mitchell, Adnan Saifuddin, Timothy W.R. Briggs, S. R. Cannon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of image guided (ultrasound or CT) percutaneous needle biopsy to percutaneous needle biopsy without image guidance in diagnosis of soft tissue tumours. Eighty-eight consecutive patients with soft tissue lesion who were referred to the soft tissue tumour unit underwent percutaneous needle biopsies of their lesion either with image guidance or without. Sixty-one out of these 88 patients subsequently underwent excision of their lesion and the excised specimen was then subjected to histological examination. The accuracy of image guided percutaneous needle biopsy and percutaneous needle biopsy without image was then calculated by comparing the histological results of the needle biopsy to that of excision biopsy. The diagnosis accuracy of image guided percutaneous needle biopsy was 92% (34 out 37) compared to 79% (22 out of 28) for percutaneous needle biopsy without image. In 3 out of the 28 patients who had percutaneous needle biopsy without image guidance, there was insufficient material obtained from the needle biopsy to allow a histological diagnosis. This was not the case with any of the patients who had image guided percutaneous needle biopsy. Conclusion: Using image guidance, either USS or CT scan, improves the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous needle biopsy and should be the gold standard technique in management of soft tissue tumours. However, if the lesion is palpable and not mobile, the accuracy of percutaneous needle biopsy without image guidance can be up to 79%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of image guided (ultrasound or CT) percutaneous needle biopsy to percutaneous needle biopsy without image guidance in diagnosis of soft tissue tumours. Eighty-eight consecutive patients with soft tissue lesion who were referred to the soft tissue tumour unit underwent percutaneous needle biopsies of their lesion either with image guidance or without. Sixty-one out of these 88 patients subsequently underwent excision of their lesion and the excised specimen was then subjected to histological examination. The accuracy of image guided percutaneous needle biopsy and percutaneous needle biopsy without image was then calculated by comparing the histological results of the needle biopsy to that of excision biopsy. The diagnosis accuracy of image guided percutaneous needle biopsy was 92% (34 out 37) compared to 79% (22 out of 28) for percutaneous needle biopsy without image. In 3 out of the 28 patients who had percutaneous needle biopsy without image guidance, there was insufficient material obtained from the needle biopsy to allow a histological diagnosis. This was not the case with any of the patients who had image guided percutaneous needle biopsy. Conclusion: Using image guidance, either USS or CT scan, improves the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous needle biopsy and should be the gold standard technique in management of soft tissue tumours. However, if the lesion is palpable and not mobile, the accuracy of percutaneous needle biopsy without image guidance can be up to 79%.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of image guided (ultrasound or CT) percutaneous needle biopsy to percutaneous needle biopsy without image guidance in diagnosis of soft tissue tumours. Eighty-eight consecutive patients with soft tissue lesion who were referred to the soft tissue tumour unit underwent percutaneous needle biopsies of their lesion either with image guidance or without. Sixty-one out of these 88 patients subsequently underwent excision of their lesion and the excised specimen was then subjected to histological examination. The accuracy of image guided percutaneous needle biopsy and percutaneous needle biopsy without image was then calculated by comparing the histological results of the needle biopsy to that of excision biopsy. The diagnosis accuracy of image guided percutaneous needle biopsy was 92% (34 out 37) compared to 79% (22 out of 28) for percutaneous needle biopsy without image. In 3 out of the 28 patients who had percutaneous needle biopsy without image guidance, there was insufficient material obtained from the needle biopsy to allow a histological diagnosis. This was not the case with any of the patients who had image guided percutaneous needle biopsy. Conclusion: Using image guidance, either USS or CT scan, improves the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous needle biopsy and should be the gold standard technique in management of soft tissue tumours. However, if the lesion is palpable and not mobile, the accuracy of percutaneous needle biopsy without image guidance can be up to 79%.

Key concepts: Medicine, Biopsy, Percutaneous, Radiology, Percutaneous biopsy, Soft tissue, Lesion, Ultrasound

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ACCURACY OF IMAGE GUIDED PERCUTANEOUS NEEDLE BIOPSY COMPARED TO PERCUTANEOUS NEEDLE BIOPSY WITHOUT IMAGE GUIDANCE IN DIAGNOSIS OF SOFT TISSUE TUMOURS. — Research Paper | ScholarLens