1979PubMedOpen access

Surgery for variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a review of our experience and present concepts.

Nagamalli Ramakrishna, James G. Martin

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The major cause of portal hypertension in Western countries is nutritional cirrhosis (parenchymal block) related to alcoholism. A third of those patients die of variceal bleeding when increased pressure within the varices precipitates bleeding. Construction of portal systemic shunts is aimed at reducing the pressure within the varices and thereby decreasing the risk of bleeding. However, it increases the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy and hence should be used only in patients who have bled. The remaining function appears to be the main factor that determines survival and the incidence of encephalopathy in obese individuals. Portacaval shunts almost completely eliminate the risk of bleeding. There is a greater incidence of hepatic encephalopathy with this procedure than with other shunts. The splenorenal shunt and the distal splenorenal shunt appear to work well in selected patients. Technically, it is a more difficult procedure. The interposition mesocaval shunt is technically easier and is also helpful in patients with ascites. Its post-shunt encephalopathy rate, however, is higher than the splenorenal shunt or the distal splenorenal shunt, though less than the portacaval shunts. Experience with the newer arterialized portacaval and coronary caval shunts is limited. A non-shunt procedure, such as the one described by Sugiura, with impressive results and follow-up may become more acceptable as experience grows.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The major cause of portal hypertension in Western countries is nutritional cirrhosis (parenchymal block) related to alcoholism. A third of those patients die of variceal bleeding when increased pressure within the varices precipitates bleeding. Construction of portal systemic shunts is aimed at reducing the pressure within the varices and thereby decreasing the risk of bleeding. However, it increases the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy and hence should be used only in patients who have bled. The remaining function appears to be the main factor that determines survival and the incidence of encephalopathy in obese individuals. Portacaval shunts almost completely eliminate the risk of bleeding. There is a greater incidence of hepatic encephalopathy with this procedure than with other shunts. The splenorenal shunt and the distal splenorenal shunt appear to work well in selected patients. Technically, it is a more difficult procedure. The interposition mesocaval shunt is technically easier and is also helpful in patients with ascites. Its post-shunt encephalopathy rate, however, is higher than the splenorenal shunt or the distal splenorenal shunt, though less than the portacaval shunts. Experience with the newer arterialized portacaval and coronary caval shunts is limited. A non-shunt procedure, such as the one described by Sugiura, with impressive results and follow-up may become more acceptable as experience grows.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The major cause of portal hypertension in Western countries is nutritional cirrhosis (parenchymal block) related to alcoholism. A third of those patients die of variceal bleeding when increased pressure within the varices precipitates bleeding. Construction of portal systemic shunts is aimed at reducing the pressure within the varices and thereby decreasing the risk of bleeding. However, it increases the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy and hence should be used only in patients who have bled. The remaining function appears to be the main factor that determines survival and the incidence of encephalopathy in obese individuals. Portacaval shunts almost completely eliminate the risk of bleeding. There is a greater incidence of hepatic encephalopathy with this procedure than with other shunts. The splenorenal shunt and the distal splenorenal shunt appear to work well in selected patients. Technically, it is a more difficult procedure. The interposition mesocaval shunt is technically easier and is also helpful in patients with ascites. Its post-shunt encephalopathy rate, however, is higher than the splenorenal shunt or the distal splenorenal shunt, though less than the portacaval shunts. Experience with the newer arterialized portacaval and coronary caval shunts is limited. A non-shunt procedure, such as the one described by Sugiura, with impressive results and follow-up may become more acceptable as experience grows.

Key concepts: Medicine, Portacaval shunt, Portal hypertension, Portal venous pressure, Ascites, Varices, Hepatic encephalopathy, Cirrhosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Surgery for variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a review of our experience and present concepts. — Research Paper | ScholarLens