2011PubMedRequires access

[Effect of left ventricular ejection fraction on clinical long-term follow-up outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention].

Chonghui Wang, Xue‐Jiao Xie, Quan Fang, Shu-yang Zhang, Zhong-jie Fang, Xiaofeng Jiang, Hongzhi Xie, Zhenyu Liu, Zhujun Shen

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: A total of 158 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention between January 2005 to December 2007 were enrolled. They were divided into three groups: LVEF≤40% (n=14), LVEF 41%-55% (n=46) and LVEF>55% group (n=98). The clinical follow-up end-point was major adverse cardiac event (MACE) including death, acute myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and stent restenosis. The clinical follow-up duration was 43.1±15.2 months. MACE occurred in 15 patients. RESULTS: The rates of infarction site, infarction relative artery, 1-vessel disease, 2-vessel disease, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, obesity and aspirin use were not different in three groups (P>0.05). Average CTnI, CK, CK-MB and duration of clopidogrel use were not different in three groups (P>0.05). The rate of 3-vessel disease was significantly higher in the LVEF≤40% group than that in the LVEF 41%-55% and LVEF>55% groups (P=0.0036). The rates of TIMI flow grades (Grade III) and complete revascularization were significantly higher in the LVEF 41%-55% and LVEF>55% groups than that in the LVEF≤40% group (P=0.0099, P=0.0010). The rates of Killip classification (classes II, III, IV) and average symptom-onset-to balloon-time (SOTB) were significantly lower in the LVEF 41%-55% and LVEF>55% groups than that in the LVEF≤40% group (P=0.0100, P=0.0087). The rate of drug-eluting stents was significantly lower in the LVEF≤40% group and LVEF 41%-55% group than that in LVEF>55% group (P=0.0242). Logistic regression analysis showed that LVEF was independent predictor for MACE in the follow-up period (P=0.0029). With LVEF decrease, incidence of MACE in the follow-up period significantly increased in LVEF>55% group, LVEF 41%-55% group and LVEF≤40% group (6.12% vs 8.7% vs 35.71%, P=0.0019). Incidence of total death and cardiac death in the follow-up period significantly increased in LVEF>55% group, LVEF 41%-55% group and LVEF≤40% group (1.02% vs 4.35% vs 21.43%, P=0.0090; 1.02% vs 2.17 vs 14.29%, P=0.0060). CONCLUSION: In patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, LVEF was independent predictor for MACE in the follow-up period. With LVEF decrease, incidence of MACE in the follow-up period significantly increased.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: A total of 158 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention between January 2005 to December 2007 were enrolled. They were divided into three groups: LVEF≤40% (n=14), LVEF 41%-55% (n=46) and LVEF>55% group (n=98). The clinical follow-up end-point was major adverse cardiac event (MACE) including death, acute myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and stent restenosis. The clinical follow-up duration was 43.1±15.2 months. MACE occurred in 15 patients. RESULTS: The rates of infarction site, infarction relative artery, 1-vessel disease, 2-vessel disease, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, obesity and aspirin use were not different in three groups (P>0.05). Average CTnI, CK, CK-MB and duration of clopidogrel use were not different in three groups (P>0.05). The rate of 3-vessel disease was significantly higher in the LVEF≤40% group than that in the LVEF 41%-55% and LVEF>55% groups (P=0.0036). The rates of TIMI flow grades (Grade III) and complete revascularization were significantly higher in the LVEF 41%-55% and LVEF>55% groups than that in the LVEF≤40% group (P=0.0099, P=0.0010). The rates of Killip classification (classes II, III, IV) and average symptom-onset-to balloon-time (SOTB) were significantly lower in the LVEF 41%-55% and LVEF>55% groups than that in the LVEF≤40% group (P=0.0100, P=0.0087). The rate of drug-eluting stents was significantly lower in the LVEF≤40% group and LVEF 41%-55% group than that in LVEF>55% group (P=0.0242). Logistic regression analysis showed that LVEF was independent predictor for MACE in the follow-up period (P=0.0029). With LVEF decrease, incidence of MACE in the follow-up period significantly increased in LVEF>55% group, LVEF 41%-55% group and LVEF≤40% group (6.12% vs 8.7% vs 35.71%, P=0.0019). Incidence of total death and cardiac death in the follow-up period significantly increased in LVEF>55% group, LVEF 41%-55% group and LVEF≤40% group (1.02% vs 4.35% vs 21.43%, P=0.0090; 1.02% vs 2.17 vs 14.29%, P=0.0060). CONCLUSION: In patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, LVEF was independent predictor for MACE in the follow-up period. With LVEF decrease, incidence of MACE in the follow-up period significantly increased.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: A total of 158 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention between January 2005 to December 2007 were enrolled. They were divided into three groups: LVEF≤40% (n=14), LVEF 41%-55% (n=46) and LVEF>55% group (n=98). The clinical follow-up end-point was major adverse cardiac event (MACE) including death, acute myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and stent restenosis. The clinical follow-up duration was 43.1±15.2 months. MACE occurred in 15 patients. RESULTS: The rates of infarction site, infarction relative artery, 1-vessel disease, 2-vessel disease, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, obesity and aspirin use were not different in three groups (P>0.05). Average CTnI, CK, CK-MB and duration of clopidogrel use were not different in three groups (P>0.05). The rate of 3-vessel disease was significantly higher in the LVEF≤40% group than that in the LVEF 41%-55% and LVEF>55% groups (P=0.0036). The rates of TIMI flow grades (Grade III) and complete revascularization were significantly higher in the LVEF 41%-55% and LVEF>55% groups than that in the LVEF≤40% group (P=0.0099, P=0.0010). The rates of Killip classification (classes II, III, IV) and average symptom-onset-to balloon-time (SOTB) were significantly lower in the LVEF 41%-55% and LVEF>55% groups than that in the LVEF≤40% group (P=0.0100, P=0.0087). The rate of drug-eluting stents was significantly lower in the LVEF≤40% group and LVEF 41%-55% group than that in LVEF>55% group (P=0.0242). Logistic regression analysis showed that LVEF was independent predictor for MACE in the follow-up period (P=0.0029). With LVEF decrease, incidence of MACE in the follow-up period significantly increased in LVEF>55% group, LVEF 41%-55% group and LVEF≤40% group (6.12% vs 8.7% vs 35.71%, P=0.0019). Incidence of total death and cardiac death in the follow-up period significantly increased in LVEF>55% group, LVEF 41%-55% group and LVEF≤40% group (1.02% vs 4.35% vs 21.43%, P=0.0090; 1.02% vs 2.17 vs 14.29%, P=0.0060). CONCLUSION: In patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, LVEF was independent predictor for MACE in the follow-up period. With LVEF decrease, incidence of MACE in the follow-up period significantly increased.

Key concepts: Ejection fraction, Medicine, Cardiology, Myocardial infarction, Internal medicine, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Mace, TIMI

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Effect of left ventricular ejection fraction on clinical long-term follow-up outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens